I know of little girls named [name_f]Soraya[/name_f] who are not Persian, and boys named [name_m]Joshua[/name_m] who are not [name_m]Christian[/name_m], as long as the name isn’t offensive to anyone (like [name_f]India[/name_f] apparently can be), then I don’t see a problem with it.
[name_f]My[/name_f] sister isn’t Greek but she wants to use the name [name_f]Athena[/name_f], she isn’t fully Irish, but loves [name_u]Rory[/name_u]. I’m not Irish, but I would love to use the name [name_m]Eamonn[/name_m] for my child. Are we being offensive? No. We simply like the look and sound of the names.
I’m English, Scottish, Welsh and [name_m]French[/name_m] - if I stick to those barriers, I can’t use a lot of names that I like. [name_f]Rosamond[/name_f] is Germanic, so that would be eliminated. [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] is Latin, that would be out. [name_m]Patrick[/name_m] is Irish, etc.
In this day in age, wouldn’t it be wrong to assume that someone’s aim when naming their child, was to offend? Wouldn’t it be wrong to say ‘you cannot use that name’ because it doesn’t belong to their culture? To me, it’s a bit racist, saying that a ‘white’ person (which is the word I often see used, the proper term is Caucasian if you want to avoid being racist, just saying) cannot use the name [name_f]Jemima[/name_f] because it COULD be racist, or it COULD offend, simply because the person is fair skinned. It’s basically saying that, unless you have consent from everyone of African descent in the world, you cannot use [name_f]Jemima[/name_f], because your skin is light in colour. Bit backwards if you ask me.
If I like the name [name_f]India[/name_f], I shouldn’t be banned from using it because of the colour of my skin. If a [name_m]Christian[/name_m] family feels as though [name_m]Cohen[/name_m] is the best name for their child, why can’t they use it? If a Muslim family likes the name [name_u]Messiah[/name_u], are you going to outright tell them that they are offensive for naming their son that? I seriously hope not.
I completely understand that some individuals can be offended by names - but in most cases, I think it’s gotten to the point where, it’s fine to acknowledge it, but we need to move on and let by gones be by gones. We’re now in the 21st Century - a place that’s supposed to be free. [name_u]Free[/name_u] to let men marry men, women marry women, coloured people become doctors and lawyers, racism and segregation are supposed to be slowly going out of society (I know they never will, but still), so why are some users on Nameberry still practicing it?
[name_f]Jemima[/name_f] and [name_f]Keziah[/name_f] are biblical names - not slave names. [name_u]Dakota[/name_u] is a place name - not just a Native tribe. [name_f]India[/name_f] is a place name.
Sorry for breaking away from the topic, and I am truly sorry if anyone’s offended, but I felt like that needed to be said.