Abigail Ruth vs Abigail Rose

Which middle name do you like better? [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] or [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. Open to other suggestions, especially middle names beginning with “R” :slight_smile:

[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]

I love [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]! So pretty!

Other possibilities

[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Raine[/name_f] or [name_f]Rayne[/name_f]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_u]Wren[/name_u]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_u]Ray[/name_u] or [name_u]Rae[/name_u]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_u]Reece[/name_u]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rebecca[/name_f]

I really like [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f]. Understated [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] is a nice compliment to the wildly popular [name_f]Abigail[/name_f].

[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] is my favourite by a long way. [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] is not often used and it’s strong and beautiful to complement [name_f]Abigail[/name_f]. [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is over-used in the middle and tends to lose impact as a result. [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_u]Rain[/name_u]/e is gorgeous.

I really like [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. I know [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is quite a bit more common than [name_f]Ruth[/name_f], and I tend to go for more uncommon names but in this case I think [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is perfect. Somehow I think [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] sounds a bit more plain, and [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] has a more flowy, romantic quality.

You can’t go wrong either way, but I love [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. I wouldn’t let the popularity of [name_f]Rose[/name_f] in the middle deny the pleasure of using it.

[name_f]Ruth[/name_f]!! It’s such a great name and is so underused! Also, it flows great with [name_f]Abigail[/name_f]. Lastly, I’m sick of [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. It’s pretty but it’s also the middle name of 50% of the girls I know. So, unless [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is meaningful, I’d skip it.
Good luck.

For me [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] is too overly Biblical. Regardless of [name_f]Rose[/name_f]'s popularity as a middle name, I much prefer [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. I also like [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_u]Ren[/name_u]ée.

Oh, I love [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f]. [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] has such a strong, vintage, distinctive vibe, and I adore it paired with [name_f]Abigail[/name_f]. What about…

[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Roxanne[/name_f]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_u]Ruby[/name_u]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rachel[/name_f]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_u]Rue[/name_u]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ramona[/name_f]

[name_f]Ruth[/name_f] is a bit too biblical, so I pick [name_f]Rose[/name_f].

I like [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f]. I think it gives [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] a more classic vibe where as [name_f]Rose[/name_f] makes it feel trendier.

[name_f]Ruth[/name_f]! So underused and unexpected. [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is a total snooze in the middle spot.

I personally like [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f], but I agree with pp that it gives the whole combo a more serious, Biblical, buttoned-up vibe. [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is more common but also more romantic sounding. One of my oldest friends is named [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f].

Definitely [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f]! Sounds very beautiful and grounded.

[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]! It sounds very upbeat and flows better.

[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f].

Oyher suggestions:

[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalia[/name_f]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rosen[/name_f]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] Regalia
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] Romily
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rosemary[/name_f]
[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Rosa[/name_f]

[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f], definitely. [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] is generally not a name I appreciate as a first, but I think it’s a strong balance to [name_f]Abigail[/name_f]. [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is becoming a throwaway middle these days - it’s pretty, and it works with [name_f]Abigail[/name_f], but I’ve lived with a throwaway middle myself ([name_u]Lynn[/name_u]) and think [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] is the much more distinctive choice.

[name_f]Abigail[/name_f] [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] :slight_smile: