You have some great choices here. I’m a fan of your style.
[name]Lark[/name] [name]Evelyn[/name] - I like it, at least I think I do. [name]Lark[/name] is one of those names that’s beautiful in theory, but when you say it out loud, it can potentially sound a bit off. Try calling it out like you would to a child, and see how silly (or not silly) you feel.
[name]Luna[/name] [name]Penelope[/name] - I really like it, but flow-wise, it’s a bit bumpy for me. I think [name]Penelope[/name], [name]Kaia[/name], and [name]Tess[/name] would make a cuter sibset, as each of their names would have a different amount of syllables, but they all have that light, sweet, airy quality.
[name]Esme[/name] [name]Coraline[/name] - Good, yes, preferably if pronounced EZZ-may. That said, despite the name’s history, it will always be associated with Twilight for me.
[name]Posy[/name] [name]Adelaide[/name] - [name]Posy[/name] as a full name is not for me, but it does complement [name]Tess[/name] well. [name]Both[/name] are short and sweet and contain an S.
[name]Anja[/name] [name]Cecily[/name] - Unless there’s a family history, I prefer spelling [name]Anya[/name], assuming you’re in an English-speaking country. Otherwise, I like it.
[name]Elin[/name] [name]Violet[/name] - Not a fan. Maybe because I don’t get “[name]Elin[/name].” Is it [name]Ellen[/name]? Isn’t that who [name]Tiger[/name] Woods cheated with? It’s my only association. Are you Swedish? Not that you have to be to use that spelling; I was just wondering if there’s any special reason you’d choose a version of the name that’s going to be much less recognisable in places like the US and UK.
[name]Sage[/name] [name]Florence[/name] - [name]Florence[/name] [name]Sage[/name] is much superior, I think. Though [name]Florence[/name] doesn’t pair particularly well with [name]Tess[/name] or [name]Kaia[/name].
[name]Ivy[/name] [name]Imogen[/name] - Not a fan of the alliteration in this case or the flow (I’m not against alliteration wholesale, just in this particular instance). That said, [name]Ivy[/name] is a wonderful match with [name]Tess[/name] and [name]Kaia[/name]. [name]Ivy[/name] [name]Coraline[/name], [name]Ivy[/name] [name]Beatrix[/name], [name]Ivy[/name] [name]Clementine[/name], [name]Ivy[/name] [name]Genevieve[/name].
[name]Sela[/name] [name]Margaret[/name] - Cute, like it a lot. [name]Sela[/name] is one of the very few names on my girl list.
[name]Eden[/name] [name]Amelia[/name] - Not a fan of [name]Eden[/name], as it feels uber-trendy. And it’s also a weirdly loaded name? It has a pleasant sound, but reminds me of names like “[name]Heaven[/name].”
[name]Nora[/name] [name]Beatrix[/name] - I like it. [name]Nora[/name], [name]Kaia[/name], and [name]Tess[/name] is a cute sibset. Though [name]Nora[/name] does sound far more serious than those names.
[name]Ruby[/name] [name]Cordelia[/name] - This is my favourite for you, at least first name [name]Ruby[/name]. [name]Ruby[/name], [name]Kaia[/name], [name]Tess[/name] – all short and sweet, but no one is left out as far as endings and matching letters.
[name]Faye[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] - Like it. Prefer [name]Fae[/name], as it seems more ethereal and less country
.
[name]Vera[/name] [name]Lillian[/name] - Like it.
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Genevieve[/name] - Not a fan of [name]Etta[/name] on its own (prefer as a nickname), but this is a pretty combo.
[name]Iris[/name] [name]Matilda[/name] - [name]Iris[/name] and [name]Matilda[/name] don’t go together to my ears. They should, as they’re both old-lady names. But they have a different feel to me.
[name]Neve[/name] [name]Charlotte[/name] - Unexpected combo and cute.
