I love love love outdoorsy names. I think all three names are great. [name_u]Alaska[/name_u] is my favorite but I’m afraid its too long/too “out there” and she will get questioned alot. ALSO my boys are [name_u]Lane[/name_u] and [name_u]Lake[/name_u] and my daughter is Myka…so was thinking another M name may flow best. If you take the “M” out of the equation Id pick [name_u]Alaska[/name_u]. ADVICE??? so torn.
[name_u]Lane[/name_u], [name_u]Lake[/name_u], [name_f]Myka[/name_f], and…
ALASKA
MONTANA
MEADOW
While I like the sibset initials split by gender, I’m wondering if the 4th sibling would feel out of place with a longer name (regardless of first initial). That being said, I love [name_u]Alaska[/name_u] for you, especially since it sounds so good alongside [name_f]Myka[/name_f]. If I had to go with one of your other choices, I’d probably go with Montana… [name_f]Meadow[/name_f] seems a little out of place. [name_f]Magnolia[/name_f] could potentially work?
[name_u]Alaska[/name_u] is great - it doesn’t feel overly long to me and it wouldn’t seem strange to me. [name_f]Myka[/name_f], [name_u]Lane[/name_u], [name_u]Lake[/name_u] and [name_u]Alaska[/name_u] are great - it’s a name of her own, but shares the -ka of [name_f]Myka[/name_f]!
[name_f]Meadow[/name_f] is great too, but then it feels like you’re committing to the L + M thing.
1 Like
[name_f]My[/name_f] favourite is [name_u]Alaska[/name_u], with [name_u]Lane[/name_u], [name_u]Lake[/name_u] and [name_u]Mika[/name_u] but I think [name_f]Meadow[/name_f] is cute with the M & L think if that is what you are going with! 
[name_u]Montana[/name_u] or [name_u]Alaska[/name_u] would go best with [name_u]Lane[/name_u], [name_u]Lake[/name_u], and [name_f]Myka[/name_f]
First, I think these are all great 
I think you should pick [name_u]Alaska[/name_u] though. You say that if you took M out of the equation (which, let’s face it, is an arbitrary rule you are enforcing on yourself), you would pick [name_u]Alaska[/name_u]. So pick [name_u]Alaska[/name_u]! I think it is a sweet name and I do not feel it is too out there.
I like [name_u]Alaska[/name_u] and [name_f]Meadow[/name_f], but I do not like [name_u]Montana[/name_u].
For some reason [name_u]Alaska[/name_u] just doesn’t seem like a person name to me. [name_u]Montana[/name_u], yes. [name_u]Alaska[/name_u], no. Maybe it’s because I have actually met a [name_u]Montana[/name_u] before, but [name_u]Alaska[/name_u] I only associate with the state. All that said, I’d go with [name_f]Meadow[/name_f].
I think it fits the sibset better.