So I’ve fallen for [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f], the only problem is that my married last name will be [name_m]Olsen[/name_m], so it’s had to be nixed. What is a girl to do! I really just love the sound. Second to [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f] is [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Claire[/name_f], which I am told sound too much like the magazine [name_f]Marie[/name_f] [name_f]Claire[/name_f], thoughts? I am not sure about [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Clara[/name_f], the flow sounds kind of weird, [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f] and [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Belle[/name_f] are under consideration. We use two middle names as well.
Sibling combo ideas on the list:
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]India[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] (SO’s idea)
[name_f]Anna[/name_f] [name_f]Lora[/name_f] [name_f]Lark[/name_f]/[name_u]Lake[/name_u] OR [name_f]Annabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Lily[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]
[name_m]John[/name_m] [name_u]Ellis[/name_u] [name_u]Michael[/name_u] Or [name_m]John[/name_m] [name_u]Everett[/name_u] (something)
We’re looking for something classical that we can pair with unexpected second middle names. Italian or [name_m]German[/name_m] names ideally; but I am not picky. Any ideas or opinions on [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f] dilemma guys?
[name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f] is absolutely useable! It was great classic choice far before [name_m]Olson[/name_m]. I love your other sibling names as well.
I think the question is whether [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f] [name_m]Olson[/name_m] is still enough in the public eye/consciousness as to make [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f] [name_m]Olsen[/name_m] unusable.
Honestly I’m not so sure…
What about using [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] [name_m]Olsen[/name_m], nickname [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f]? Is that still too close? [name_f]Do[/name_f] you like [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] itself as an alternative?
I’ll have to disagree with the above. [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f] [name_m]Olsen[/name_m] just seems like too much to me, though [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f], nn [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f], could work.
Would you consider switching it around? [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f]/[name_f]Katherine[/name_f] [name_f]Mary[/name_f]?
I really love, love, love [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Claire[/name_f]!
Personally, I think naming your daughter [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f] [name_m]Olsen[/name_m] is a bad idea. It’s a pretty name, but there is too big of a reference to the [name_m]Olsen[/name_m] twins.
I don’t think the Olsens twins are all that popular any more especially to the new generation. I think [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f] is absolutely doable now. But my favorite [name_f]Mary[/name_f] combo is [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f] nn [name_f]Gracie[/name_f]. [name_f]Mary[/name_f] [name_f]Kate[/name_f] is a close second! Adorable!