[name_f]My[/name_f] fav is [name_m]Thomas[/name_m], but I prefer [name_m]Peter[/name_m] [name_m]Nathaniel[/name_m] to [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_u]Micah[/name_u]
[name_f]My[/name_f] favorite is [name_m]Peter[/name_m] or [name_m]Thomas[/name_m]. Of your combo list, I really like [name_m]Peter[/name_m] [name_m]Nathaniel[/name_m].
I’m very biased towards [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] (it’s my brother’s name) I just think it works for every age and Sam/Sammy are great nicknames. It’s just a very strong classic name. I also love [name_m]Peter[/name_m]! Great, strong, biblical list all around!
[name_m]Peter[/name_m] as a first name. But if you’re combos [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]Peter[/name_m]. I’d like [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] over [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_m]Andrew[/name_m].
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] Peter-Samuel is just so sweet & charming & handsome & lovable. And the nn [name_u]Sam[/name_u] is boyish & sporty & playful. [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] is classic, but doesn’t feel as over done as some other timeless names in the same vain. [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]Peter[/name_m] is a beautiful combo as well.
[name_m]Peter[/name_m] Nathaniel-Peter is really handsome & feels proper yet kind. I love the flow of [name_m]Peter[/name_m] [name_m]Nathaniel[/name_m]. [name_m]Peter[/name_m] is really easy & well known but not too popular. I like the nn [name_m]Pete[/name_m] okay, but really love the nns [name_u]Pip[/name_u] & [name_m]Patch[/name_m] if you like stretch-y nns. [name_m]Just[/name_m] [name_m]Peter[/name_m] on its own is great though, & doesn’t really need a nn.
[name_m]Andrew[/name_m] Micah-This is a cool unexpected combo. [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] is really popular in my area, but it is a sweet name. It’s strong but kind of quiet. I don’t like [name_u]Andy[/name_u] or [name_u]Drew[/name_u] much. I feel like they’re sort of done to death in the 80s/90s.
[name_m]Thomas[/name_m] Andrew-I like [name_m]Thomas[/name_m]. It’s classic & handsome. It’s not super exciting, but it’s nice enough. I’m not a fan of [name_m]Tom[/name_m] or [name_m]Tommy[/name_m]. That’s the main reason I can’t get into this name.
I love [name_m]Peter[/name_m] [name_m]Nathaniel[/name_m] and [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] Peter!! I’ve loved [name_m]Peter[/name_m] for many years, but [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] is a more recent love
I like [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] or [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] but with the middle names I like [name_m]Peter[/name_m] [name_m]Nathaniel[/name_m]. If I could mix and match I would go with [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_m]Nathaniel[/name_m] and [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Micah[/name_u]
Maybe [name_m]Peter[/name_m]? [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] and [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] are nice too. [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]Peter[/name_m] is probably my favorite combo though [name_u]Micah[/name_u] is my favorite individual name in those combos.
[name_f]My[/name_f] least favorite is [name_m]Thomas[/name_m].
Either [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] or [name_m]Thomas[/name_m], depending on the day. Both are in my top five. I think the prominent “m” sound makes them soft and warm but the long history of use gives them a solidness that I like too.
[name_m]Peter[/name_m] I like in theory but it still feels a bit dusty to me. [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] is my least favorite. It feels less classic and I don’t love my associations with it.