The only one that i dont like is [name_f]Blossom[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] cause it seems a bit too cutesy to me. All the others are completely usable imo. My personal favourite is [name_f]Willow[/name_f] [name_f]Saskia[/name_f].
Gosh, so many of these are so beautiful! I think that most are very usable on job applications and such. Having a unique name is likely going to be less of a hindrance in the future, as the variety of names being used on children these days is much wider. Plus, people with names from [name_m]Bill[/name_m] to [name_f]Kamala[/name_f], from [name_m]John[/name_m] to [name_f]Uma[/name_f], have succeeded in their chosen fields. I think the most important thing is that a name isn’t overly cutesy, and truly none of these are. Besides, in a job interview situation, only first names tend to be taken into account (middles are often initial only), so middle names aren’t a huge factor. I particularly love [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f] [name_f]Moon[/name_f], [name_f]Sunniva[/name_f] [name_f]Lux[/name_f], [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Reverie[/name_f], and [name_f]Blossom[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f].
So many lovely names!! I love [name_f]Willow[/name_f] [name_f]Saskia[/name_f], [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Reverie[/name_f], Elownen [name_u]Sage[/name_u] and [name_f]Sunniva[/name_f] [name_f]Lux[/name_f]!!
I agree with pp though that [name_f]Blossom[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] is the only one I wouldn’t consider. I think it would work better reversed or without alliteration
I know what you mean about [name_f]Blossom[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f]. My aunt was called [name_f]Blossom[/name_f] ( not her real name but thats all she was ever known as) and [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] is my partners grandma. Another honour name is [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] so maybe [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] [name_f]Blossom[/name_f] might be better?
I love [name_f]Sunniva[/name_f] [name_f]Lux[/name_f], [name_f]Cosima[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] “[name_f]Coco[/name_f]”, [name_f]Elowen[/name_f] [name_u]Sage[/name_u], [name_f]Kerensa[/name_f] [name_u]Dove[/name_u], [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f] [name_f]Moon[/name_f] and [name_f]Willow[/name_f] [name_f]Saskia[/name_f].
I agree about [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Blossom[/name_f] vs. [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] [name_f]Blossom[/name_f]. The first is a little too “stage name”-ish, but the addition of uber-classic [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] grounds the whole combo and makes it feel quirky-classic, and very cool.
[name_f]Willow[/name_f] [name_f]Saskia[/name_f] (love!) is the only solidly usable one. I think [name_f]Elowen[/name_f] [name_u]Sage[/name_u] makes for a brave but usable choice as well.
[name_u]Love[/name_u] seeing [name_f]Reverie[/name_f] and [name_f]Lux[/name_f], btw.
[name_f]Sunniva[/name_f] [name_f]Lux[/name_f], [name_f]Cosima[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f], [name_f]Elowen[/name_f] [name_u]Sage[/name_u], and [name_f]Cordelia[/name_f] [name_f]Reverie[/name_f] all feel very polished/complete. I love them! I think with a little tweaking and possibly a second middle that [name_f]Blossom[/name_f] and [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] can work really nicely together.
My naming preferences trend to the more conservative side, but even with that in mind I think [name_f]Cosima[/name_f] “[name_f]Coco[/name_f]” [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is beautiful!
My favorite is [name_f]Willow[/name_f] [name_f]Saskia[/name_f], but I also like [name_f]Sunniva[/name_f] [name_f]Lux[/name_f] & [name_f]Kerensa[/name_f] [name_u]Dove[/name_u] quite a bit. And I love the middle name of [name_f]Reverie[/name_f]!
They are all very beautiful. I think you really have a knack for pretty names. I think [name_f]Elowen[/name_f] [name_u]Sage[/name_u] is the most useable and [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f] [name_f]Moon[/name_f] is the most beautiful. But since middle names are rarely heard I think all of them are useable. I don’t find any of them too out-there.