[name]Do[/name] you think some names are better than others? Like is [name]Eleanor[/name] better than [name]Neveah[/name]? What names are best?
Would you describe these names suitable for children:
Place names? Like [name]London[/name], [name]Massey[/name], [name]York[/name], [name]India[/name]…
Surnames? Like [name]Hayden[/name], [name]Harper[/name], [name]Madison[/name], [name]Lacey[/name]…
Word names? [name]Willow[/name], [name]Melody[/name], [name]Pearl[/name], [name]Autumn[/name], [name]Lake[/name], [name]Star[/name]…
Title names? Like [name]Duke[/name], [name]Queen[/name], [name]Princess[/name], [name]Earl[/name], Lady, Viscount, [name]Count[/name]…
Biblical names? Like [name]Sarah[/name], [name]Elizabeth[/name], [name]Anne[/name], [name]Leah[/name], [name]Rachel[/name], [name]John[/name]…
Gaelic and Scottish names? [name]Fiona[/name], [name]Mairead[/name], [name]Aoife[/name], [name]Deidre[/name], [name]Sean[/name]…
Invented names?
Names that are differently spelled? Like Byonkah ([name]Bianca[/name]), [name]Locklyn[/name], [name]Sofia[/name], [name]Vivienne[/name]…
Foreign names? Like [name]Priya[/name], [name]Tena[/name], [name]Nina[/name], [name]Lucia[/name], [name]Karolina[/name] (this is polish name)…
Literature names?
Greek and [name]Roman[/name] names? Like [name]Bryony[/name], [name]Circe[/name], [name]Helena[/name], [name]Antonia[/name], [name]Martina[/name], [name]Augustus[/name], [name]Marcellus[/name], [name]Homer[/name], [name]Julius[/name]…
Dog names? What makes one random name a name for pet?
What makes names better or worse?
Should parents who choose worse names be ashamed? Should person who likes invented names be ashamed? Should they change their taste?
I think there are no names that are better than others. I think invented names are just as equally good as biblical names as [name]Elizabeth[/name]. [name]IMO[/name] names that are not offensive (like Trash and Whore, not every name with potentially bad nn) are suitable for children. Parent should not be ashamed if they love some name for their children.
I agree with you, that no name is necessarily “better” than another one, but I think it all has to do with style. [name]Do[/name] I like made up name? No, not really. [name]Do[/name] I like classic names? Yes, that’s pretty much all I like. So for my future children, I think classic names are “better” but if someone wants to use a made up name, then that’s what’s better for them.
It may not be a popular opinion, but yes - I think so. People want to bury their head in the sand and pretend that names don’t come along with connotations or stigmas attached to them and your love of a name should not result in your child suffering in any way. I’m sorry, but the simple fact is that [name]Eleanor[/name] IS a better name than [name]Nevaeh[/name]. Why? [name]Eleanor[/name] has been around for a very long time. It has a backbone, a meaning and it’s one that demands respect and brings to mind people who are educated and classy. [name]Nevaeh[/name], on the other hand, it made-up nonsense. It has nothing to stand on other than being a word spelled backwards, it has connotations of low-class, uneducated people, or people who are overly religious. It’s spelling does not make sense with the popular pronunciation people give to it and in the end, whether you want to admit it or not, names like “[name]Heaven[/name]” (or in this case - [name]Heaven[/name] spelled backwards) has always and [name]WILL[/name] always bring to mind images of adult entertainment and other things that anyone with half an ounce of class would not want associated with their daughters.
These stigmas and connotations [name]DO[/name] exist and they [name]DO[/name] matter whether you want to admit it or not. When your daughter grows up and has to function as an adult, is it fair to have those stigmas and connotations follow her around for the rest of her life? People judging her badly based on her name (which we all admit is NOT fair or right, but it happens, everyone does it whether they mean to or admit it or not) and your love for a name should not cloud your judgement on something as important as a name that your child has to live with for the rest of their life.
I agree with flick. you cannot separate yourself from the associations made by society.
I will take it further.
Naming is very much an art form, and very much like art.
You hear people say, well all art is good, because it’s based on your personal preference, and other such things about opinion.
But this is simply not true.
Some people really are better artists, and some people really are better namers. It’s not something you can exactly put your finger on, and it surely does have a lot to do with taste, but that doesn’t mean there is not a distinction to be made.
A [name]Manet[/name] is most definitely better than your average person’s painting. And it’s because of experience, thoughtfulness, and the ability to evoke feeling.
A beautiful name is stunning, provokes thought, and it evokes feelings in the person who hears it. It is art.
I think the idea of one name being better than another is subjective but some names are more respected than others and imo because of that they are often perceived as being better by a great number of people.
I think what defines a name as ‘better’ depends on where you live and what era you live in. Our ideas of what makes a name good or bad depend a lot on the associations and history we perceive a name to have. While something might seem quite classic and timeless to us (and thus, ‘better’), many of these ‘classic’ names were also, at one point, considered either low-class or made-up rubbish. People didn’t really start deviating from using family names until the late 1800s, I believe, and I’d bet money that the ones who deviated or used the ‘trendy’ names we hold up as timeless classics weren’t thought of as sensible (or even stylish) namers.
Having said that, I agree with previous posters that there is something to be said for considering the genral stereotypes associated with names. People’s perceptions affect how they view both you and your child, and that can in turn affect how your child sees themselves. A [name]Sarah[/name] tends to perform better in school than Krystalique, for example. Employers are also more likely (sub-consciously) to hire [name]Sarah[/name] because she ‘sounds’ more reliable. Sad? Yes. Unfair? Yes. [name]True[/name]? Yes. I think that’s primarily why people consider some names ‘good’ and others ‘bad’. A rose by any other name may smell just as sweet, but (in the paraphrased words of [name]Anne[/name] [name]Shirley[/name]), it wouldn’t have the same appeal if it were called a skunk cabbage.
To me, arguments like ‘has been around for very long time’ and ‘meaning’ means nothing to me. Name is a name, no matter how long has been around. ‘Meaning’ means nothing, because when [name]Eleanor[/name] meets [name]Rachel[/name] they will not say “[name]Hi[/name] I am [name]Eleanor[/name], it means ‘other Aenor’”. Meaning of the name is only tibit.
Second, I will never perceive somebody like less valuable member of society if they had name like [name]Nevaeh[/name]. If many people do that, I think that’s their problem and we should not bother ourselves what random people thinks.
So what?
You really thinks parents of little [name]Neveah[/name] want that their daughter will be connected to adult entertainment?
Please, give me evidence that [name]Neveah[/name] is bringing connections to adult entertainment, because I think you just making things out of your mind.
So should black people start giving birth white children because black people get social stigma? Because black people have problems fuction as adults?
You are defending social stigma. Are you aware of that?
I don’t think some names are better than others. Actually, I think the simple notion of that is silly. Everyone has their preferences, but that doesn’t mean what they like is better than what you do.
I think if you love a name, go for it. If the name is one that carries social stigma, raise your children to be strong, decent people and maybe they’ll help change the stigma of the name.
Names being better than another kind is subjective, but there are names which are better to give to your child than others. For example, if you name your child [name]Adolf[/name], he will be forever associated with the Nazi leader, despite the fact you may have named him after Great Uncle [name]Adolphus[/name] with all good intentions. It might be that you absolutely adore [name]Adolf[/name], but there’s no denying the fact a better name for your child might be [name]Arthur[/name] or [name]Alfie[/name], because he won’t suffer anywhere near the amount of social stigma than he would as [name]Adolf[/name].
Apart from extreme examples such as that, naming is subjective and all down to personal preference. Some people think a better name for a child is one that makes them stand out and be unique, which leads to made-up names, creative spellings and cross-gender naming/nicknaming (“Which [name]Harry[/name]?” “The girl one”). Others think having a name that fits in is better, hence the use of popular names. Some want to honour somewhere special in their child’s name - [name]Paris[/name], [name]Ocean[/name] - while others might desire to name after an elderly relative, which is likely to be with more classic names - [name]Elizabeth[/name], [name]Edward[/name] - and others might want to honour their heritage - [name]Krystyna[/name], [name]Eilidh[/name].
Personally, I think [name]Eleanor[/name] is a better name than [name]Nevaeh[/name] for me, and that’s the key point. While I don’t love either name, [name]Eleanor[/name] has more of what I look for in a name than [name]Nevaeh[/name] and so if I had to choose between one or the other for my child, I would say [name]Eleanor[/name] is the better name for my daughter. I think the thing is that naming is so diverse and one man’s sugar is another man’s poison, or however the saying goes.
I love the pp about naming being like an art. And like art names mean different things to different people, impact different people in different ways…and like art, some names aren’t appreciated in their time. My dear grandmother shrieks at most of my list, “[name]Maude[/name]! I knew somany Maudes! All of them were awful!”. It’s funny how [name]Maude[/name] could be a spunky & underused vintage blank slate of a name to me, but to my grandmother it’s like [name]Heather[/name] might sound to a 30 year old!
[name]Neveah[/name] could be “adult entertainment” to some “modern religious” to others and “dreamy beauty” to others still. In 20 years [name]Neveah[/name] could be connected to a scandal or a celebrity, a politician or a great inventor. There’s no telling.
Personally I like word names, but a backwards one is a bit hokey imo. Some names are better than others imo for me, but unless someone is asking my opinion on a name I have no comments.