I like:
[name_f]Deborah[/name_f]
[name_f]Judith[/name_f]
[name_f]Marie[/name_f]
[name_u]Meredith[/name_u]
[name_f]Kathleen[/name_f]
[name_f]Irene[/name_f]
[name_f]Rosemary[/name_f] & [name_f]Rosemarie[/name_f]
[name_f]Roxanne[/name_f]
[name_u]Kay[/name_u]
[name_f]Bridget[/name_f]
Boys
[name_m]Gregory[/name_m]
[name_u]Michael[/name_u]
[name_m]Duncan[/name_m]
[name_u]Shane[/name_u]
[name_m]Stephen[/name_m]
[name_u]Francis[/name_u] NN [name_m]Frank[/name_m]
[name_m]Vincent[/name_m]
[name_m]Victor[/name_m]
[name_m]Harvey[/name_m]
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m]
[name_m]Alan[/name_m]
Not sure whether to count [name_f]Caroline[/name_f] or slide it towards classic. Would be willing to consider [name_f]Deborah[/name_f] or [name_f]Judith[/name_f] classic too but [name_f]Debbie[/name_f] and [name_f]Judy[/name_f] are so tied to a '50s image I think of them as middle-aged-but-like-anyhow. [name_f]Marie[/name_f] I would have thought of as classic but NB says its old and out of style, so middle-aged I guess. If not dustier.
I guess the question could be raised of if these are “middle-aged” or “old” in some cases, but I don’t think they’re so-old-they’re-back in any case.