Article on "Black" baby names

For arguments sake couldn’t [name_f]Shaniqua[/name_f] be from the root name [name_u]Shannon[/name_u], maybe smooshed with the -ique suffix in [name_u]Dominique[/name_u], [name_f]Veronique[/name_f], or a play on the -nic ending? So would age/namesakes deemed worthy be the only thing that separates it from a name like [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]?

You’re combining to different parts of my post. Not all “[name_m]Black[/name_m]” names are made up or “downmarket”. Off the top of my head, one of the “[name_m]Black[/name_m]” names that an OP was warned about was [name_u]Tyson[/name_u]. What’s so “[name_m]Black[/name_m]” and “downmarket” about that? The only [name_u]Tyson[/name_u] I know is a blue-eyed blond.

Why do you think names like [name_f]Aisha[/name_f], [name_m]Malik[/name_m], [name_u]Kenya[/name_u], and [name_m]Kwame[/name_m] have grown in popularity since the 1970s? Because since then, some [name_m]Black[/name_m] Americans have looked to the African continent for baby names. Some instead take a different route and choose to make up their own names.

@nat108 - [name_u]Tyson[/name_u] may be viewed as “black” name for two reasons: boxer [name_m]Mike[/name_m] [name_u]Tyson[/name_u] and male model [name_u]Tyson[/name_u] Beckford. [name_m]Both[/name_m] men are black so that’s why the name may be labelled as “black”.

I wasn’t saying they had to, but the article suggested that they were attempting to differentiate themselves from white people. If that really was the goal then ‘heritage’ names could have been an option rather than making up names.

I see what you mean about people wanting to create a new and modern culture for themselves though.