Does this work? Or is it too far of a stretch? Have you ever heard of anyone using the nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u] for a little [name_m]Atticus[/name_m]?
I love it! 
I adore the nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u] for [name_m]Atticus[/name_m]
I’ve never personally met an [name_m]Atticus[/name_m], but I have heard many other berries (including myself) consider using [name_m]Atticus[/name_m] nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u]
I like it! I love [name_u]Kit[/name_u] as a name in itself, and I’m not a fan of [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] … [name_m]Atticus[/name_m] nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u] is much more interesting.
I think it’s a great idea!
Makes sense to me!
I think it definitely works. It’s my favourite nickname for [name_m]Atticus[/name_m]. I’ve never met one, but for what it’s worth, I’ve seen [name_m]Atticus[/name_m] nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u] in the sigs of plenty of Berries too.
Not something I’ve seen or thought about before, but it’s adorable!
I love this idea!
Very cute…
I think this is adorable! [name_u]Kit[/name_u] is one of my favourite nicknames - I’ve only ever considered it for [name_m]Christopher[/name_m], but I love it for Attics
I actually know an [name_m]Atticus[/name_m] nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u] in real life! So it’s definitely usable! I think [name_u]Kit[/name_u] is lovely and it makes a fab nickname for [name_m]Atticus[/name_m]
Ooh I have never thought about this before - its a fantastic idea!
I like [name_m]Atticus[/name_m] much more than [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] as a long form! Can’t say I’ve heard it before, but I think it works!
I’ve heard of [name_m]Atticus[/name_m] nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u] quite a lot, actually, so it doesn’t seem like a stretch now, but it pretty much did when I first heard it. I personally like [name_f]Atti[/name_f] or [name_u]Gus[/name_u] for [name_m]Atticus[/name_m] more, but I guess [name_u]Gus[/name_u] is as much of a stretch as [name_u]Kit[/name_u] is… (Either way, I think [name_m]Atticus[/name_m] is dreamy!)