Well, she’s got to be something other than “the baby”…
We want to use [name_f]Angela[/name_f] as a middle name, and was wondering which one went better (I know neither flows that well, but flow isn’t our top priority), but would another mn fix the flow? [name_f]Lavinia[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] [name_f]Angela[/name_f]/[name_f]Aurelia[/name_f] [name_f]Faye[/name_f] [name_f]Angela[/name_f], etc.
[name_f]Aurelia[/name_f]'s recent (agressive) upward trend worries me, though. My name is [name_f]Isabella[/name_f], which was uncommon when I was born, not so much now, and I can’t help but feel all the little girls stole my name (just kidding). But almost every one in my family gets named an unusual name, only to have it peak ten, twenty years later, (except aunt [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f], haha) and I’d love it if it didn’t happen to bump (yes, we are still calling her that.)
What kind of “vibe” do the names give you? Which one would you let into uni/hire based on names alone? (DH says [name_f]Aurelia[/name_f] seems more “trustworthy”?)