I’m sorry you’re struggling with this! But you will decide on a perfect name soon enough!
[name_f][/name_f]There is nothing unusable about [name_m]Whitaker[/name_m] [name_m]Woods[/name_m] [name_m]Williams[/name_m]. Is it W-heavy? Yes. Is it bad, offensive, or silly? No!
[name_f][/name_f]You have to decide if all the W’s bother you[name_f][/name_f] personally. I don’t see the name affecting your son negatively in any way, and as long as that’s the case you and your OH can name him however you wish.
[name_f][/name_f]For the record, I think it sounds fine said out loud, though your other options you listed do have easier flow.
[name_f][/name_f]I’m not sure what you mean by triple surname [name_f][/name_f]- are there two more surnames in addition to [name_m]Williams[/name_m]? That does[name_f][/name_f] make for quite a long name. I fear that could be a hassle for your son [name_f][/name_f]- would you be willing to stick with two surnames, or drop [name_m]Woods[/name_m] and make one or two of the planned surnames, middle names instead? Example: [name_m]Whitaker[/name_m] [name_m]Woods[/name_m] [name_m]Williams[/name_m] [name_m]Cooper[/name_m] [name_m]Smith[/name_m] becomes [name_m]Whitaker[/name_m] (Woods) [name_m]Williams[/name_m] [name_m]Smith[/name_m], or [name_m]Whitaker[/name_m] (Williams Cooper) [name_m]Smith[/name_m]? (middles in parantheses)
[name_f][/name_f]If we’re casting votes for favorites, I’m going for [name_m]Whit[/name_m] [name_m]Theodore[/name_m]: I think it has the best flow, and the shorter first name could make the subsequent multiple surnames easier to digest.
[name_f][/name_f]You will figure it out!! Good luck!