[name_m]Whitaker[/name_m] [name_m]Woods[/name_m] [name_m]Williams[/name_m] is a lot of W and it’s a slower sound to produce with your mouth so that lends it to feeling cumbersome – but it’s completely usable. The main two things I would focus on are:
[name_f][/name_f]- [name_f][/name_f]
- [name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Do[/name_f] you both like [name_m]Whitaker[/name_m] as a name in it’s own right, enough to use it regularly or occasionally? If your husband isn’t particularity keen on [name_m]Whitaker[/name_m] in general and would likely never use it, I would go for [name_m]Whit[/name_m] as the full name. [name_m]Whit[/name_m] [name_m]Williams[/name_m] is dashing and really nice to say. The middle name won’t be said aloud very much so I would prioritise the sound of the first name-surname over the first name-middle-surname.
[name_f][/name_f] [name_f][/name_f] - [name_f][/name_f]
Think of the name story you would want to share with your son. Does it feel meaningful or joyful for you? Does it feel relatively comparable to your daughter’s name story (I don’t mean matching in style, but relatively similar in weight?) One day you’ll share with him the story of his name. The WWW initials are a bold statement so he’d be curious about the choice as would others. I think some would expect a special reason for the initials but you can still choose simply because they are your combined favourites.
[name_f][/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
Another thought [name_f][/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]— [name_m]Whitman[/name_m] as an alternative route to [name_m]Whit[/name_m]. [name_m]Whitman[/name_m] [name_m]Woods[/name_m] [name_m]Williams[/name_m]. [name_m]Whitman[/name_m] [name_m]Williams[/name_m]. I’m a big fan of [name_m]Whit[/name_m] [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] from your list, but that may feel like too much compromise for you (as no formal name or nature theme).
[name_f][/name_f]Ultimately, the name is fine but it sounds like it’s just not working for you. Sometimes putting our top names together doesn’t make for the best combination. If that’s how you feel, as sad as it is, I’d suggest letting go of [name_m]Woods[/name_m]. You have lots of lovely alternative middle name options you can use and time enough to find another nature middle name if you wish. If you’re wanting to expand your family, you could also keep [name_m]Woods[/name_m] for future son or daughter.
[name_f][/name_f]You’re making the decision together and you’re doing it thoughtfully, with great love and care. So be encouraged that whatever name you ultimately choose will be a good name for your son.