Baby Girl in December...

See the results of this poll: What to name baby girl 2

Respondents: 45 (This poll is closed)

  • Georgia Katherine : 10 (18%)
  • Lila Katherine : 11 (20%)
  • Ava Katherine : 3 (5%)
  • Nora Katherine : 13 (23%)
  • Violet Katherine : 15 (27%)
  • Lorelei Katherine: 4 (7%)

I like the look of [name_f]Lila[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] but next to her siblings names, it looks a bit unsubstantial…idk.

I voted for [name_f]Violet[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f], which I think it gorgeous.

I really like [name_f]Violet[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f], but I’m not sure I like it with [name_f]Bridget[/name_f]. They seem very similar. My other choices would be [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] then [name_f]Nora[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]. :slight_smile:

[name_f]Nora[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] is beautiful.

You have several nice combinations, but when together with her sibs, I like [name_f]Bridget[/name_f], [name_m]Joseph[/name_m], and [name_f]Nora[/name_f] best. Second choice is [name_f]Lorelei[/name_f].

Here’s why I would eliminate the rest:

  1. [name_f]Violet[/name_f] is too similar to [name_f]Bridget[/name_f]. [name_f]Viola[/name_f] or [name_u]Vivian[/name_u] could work though.
  2. [name_f]Lila[/name_f] is too nick-namey next to the more solid [name_f]Bridget[/name_f] and [name_m]Joseph[/name_m]. [name_f]Lillian[/name_f] works well as a possible alternative.
  3. [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] has the same starting sound as [name_m]Joseph[/name_m]. [name_f]Grace[/name_f] or [name_f]Gloria[/name_f] would work.
  4. [name_f]Ava[/name_f] doesn’t have the substantial feel of [name_f]Bridget[/name_f] and [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] either. [name_u]Evelyn[/name_u], [name_f]Avis[/name_f], or [name_f]Mavis[/name_f] would work.

Some other possibilities:

[name_f]Bridget[/name_f], [name_m]Joseph[/name_m], and

[name_f]Alice[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Dorothy[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Eliza[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Frances[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Hester[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Laura[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Lydia[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Margot[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Susannah[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Theresa[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f]

I really like all of your choices but [name_f]Ava[/name_f] - it’s too trendy and just not really my style. [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] is my favorite combo, but I like [name_f]Nora[/name_f] best in your sibset.

I voted for [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] for two reasons:

  1. It flows the best with your surname
  2. It has the same vintage sass as [name_f]Bridget[/name_f]

[name_f]Nora[/name_f] may be good with your other children’s names but I don’t like the back-to-back a’s of [name_f]Nora[/name_f] [name_m]Allen[/name_m]. [name_f]Georgia[/name_f] is similar in sound with [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] but I don’t think that’s a huge problem. At least they have different initials and endings.