Purely going with how they sound, Elmer, Chester, Stanley and Melvin appeal to me. Taking a name out of its cultural and historical context gets quite murkyâŚthereâs a lot to consider.
I think [name_m]Horace[/name_m] & [name_u]Stanley[/name_u] could be nice on girls.
[name_m]Abraham[/name_m] seems⌠inappropriate for a girl, because it means âfather of manyâ. Anyway, I probably wouldnât use any of these for a girl. I donât mind gender bending, but you have to consider youâre naming an actual child when using these, and the child will have to live with it.
[name_m]Hugh[/name_m] is one of my nicknames (Iâm a girl). I like it as an idea, but I do prefer it as just a natural nickname. Perhaps [name_u]Edward[/name_u], [name_u]Robert[/name_u], or [name_u]Montgomery[/name_u] would work⌠though these are heavy. Definitely a lot to parse.
Wow these are definitely the clunky end of boy names for girlsâŚI can just about see [name_u]Montgomery[/name_u] or [name_m]Morris[/name_m] working as theyâre surnames anyway (plus [name_u]Monty[/name_u] and [name_u]Mo[/name_u] could be fun nicknames on a girl!) but the rest probably not. Maybe [name_u]Elmer[/name_u] and [name_u]Stanley[/name_u] since they follow girl name patterns? Tbh I think in theory any name can be worn by anybody because theyâre just words, but depending on meaning and usage some are going to be heavier and less wearable than others for the âotherâ gender.
I donât like any of them I am sorry except for, I think only [name_u]Montgomery[/name_u] could somehow work, with nickname Gogo, [name_u]Merry[/name_u] or [name_f]Mary[/name_f].
I enjoy many of these for boys especially [name_m]Albert[/name_m] and [name_m]Morris[/name_m]. And [name_u]Montgomery[/name_u].
I like some more feminine names for boys as well, such as [name_u]Robin[/name_u] and [name_u]Evelyn[/name_u] (EEV-lin).
I like [name_u]Camille[/name_u] for a boy more than for a girl, with the [name_u]French[/name_u] pronunciation/in a [name_u]French[/name_u] context.
I think these are too masculine to be a girlâs name, sorry. I think they should stay on the boysâ side. The only ones that I can see, perhaps assuming the parents were adventurous, are [name_u]Melvin[/name_u], [name_m]Morris[/name_m] and [name_u]Elmer[/name_u] (in keeping with naming trends of late). Maybe [name_u]Montgomery[/name_u] and [name_u]Stanley[/name_u] too, like others say.
I actually knew a girl named [name_m]Ethan[/name_m] and it worked surprisingly well for her. I also have a female boss named [name_m]Jonathan[/name_m] but she goes exclusively by [name_u]Jonnie[/name_u] as, obviously, everyone thinks she is a man. I canât picture any of the others on a girl, though. Theyâre all very masculine.
I donât care for any of the full names on girls, but many of them have nicknames that would work: [name_u]Robby[/name_u], [name_u]Eddie[/name_u], [name_f]Ricki[/name_f], [name_u]Mel[/name_u], [name_m]Jonny[/name_m]
Honestly, the only way I could even imagine any of these names on a girl would be as a middle, and named as a serious honor name (read: father, grandfatherâŚ, not second cousin once removedâs neighbor.)
[name_m]Albert[/name_m] is perfect. [name_u]Allie[/name_u], [name_u]Albie[/name_u], [name_u]Bertie[/name_u]. How about [name_f]Alberte[/name_f]? Idk that just struck me.
To me and where I come from most of these names I find hard to put on girls. I have nothing against it but the kind of âboyâ names I like on girls are more [name_u]Charlie[/name_u] and [name_u]Everest[/name_u]. I just know that the child has to live with this name for the rest of their lives. I really just prefer simpler names just donât over complicate things!
Most of these are hard for me to picture on a girl. However I have had friends consider Stanley for their daughter. And I could see Montgomery (since itâs more surnamey/ place name) Morris, and Ethan working. I want to say Horace, but the first syllable would keep me from using it on a girl and if you say it fast it sounds like your saying wh*res