[name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_m]Jove[/name_m] - This combo, while not my cup of tea, definitely flows well and sounds nice.
[name_m]Jessop[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] “[name_u]Jess[/name_u]; [name_u]Jesse[/name_u]” - Honestly, not a huge fan of [name_m]Jessop[/name_m], personally. With the combo as a whole, I think [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Jessop[/name_m] would flow better.
[name_m]Harold[/name_m] [name_u]Remy[/name_u], “[name_u]Halley[/name_u]; [name_m]Harry[/name_m]; [name_m]Rollo[/name_m]” - Not my style, but I like it. [name_m]Harry[/name_m] would be my favorite nn for it!
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m] Lewin, “[name_u]Ari[/name_u] / [name_m]Ary[/name_m]” - Same as above (minus the [name_m]Harry[/name_m] part, of course). The names complement each other well, I think.
[name_m]Ignatius[/name_m] [name_f]Briar[/name_f], “[name_m]Nash[/name_m]; [name_m]Iggy[/name_m]” - [name_f]Briar[/name_f] has always felt more feminine to me. But [name_m]Ignatius[/name_m] is really cool!
[name_u]Francis[/name_u] [name_m]Cosmo[/name_m], “[name_u]Frankie[/name_u]” - I [name_u]LOVE[/name_u] [name_u]Francis[/name_u]! It’s great to see it being used in a boys’ combo; it is sadly underappreciated, imho. I’m pretty indifferent to [name_m]Cosmo[/name_m]; not really sure if I like it with [name_u]Francis[/name_u] or not…
[name_u]Noel[/name_u] [name_m]Xavier[/name_m] - It doesn’t have the best flow when [name_m]Xavier[/name_m] is pronounced the way I pronounce it: Zay-vier. But if you say the ‘Ex’ part, then it’s a good, strong combo.
[name_u]Percy[/name_u] [name_m]Icarus[/name_m] - Not a fan, personally.
[name_m]Finnian[/name_m] [name_u]Asa[/name_u], “[name_u]Finn[/name_u]” - I like it! An unexpected combo, but I think it sounds nice.
[name_m]Linus[/name_m] [name_u]Arlo[/name_u] - I don’t really care for the pairing, though the names are fine individually.
[name_m]Hamish[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m] - Neither name is at all my style, but, from an objective standpoint, they make a great pair!
[name_m]Leonard[/name_m] [name_m]Rune[/name_m], “[name_m]Leo[/name_m]; [name_m]Len[/name_m]; [name_m]Lenny[/name_m]” - Not a fan, sorry. 
[name_m]Frederick[/name_m] [name_m]Gilead[/name_m], “[name_m]Frey[/name_m]” - I like [name_m]Frederick[/name_m], [name_m]Frey[/name_m] is cool and unique, and [name_m]Gilead[/name_m] is a neat, unexpected mn.
[name_m]Casper[/name_m] [name_u]Linden[/name_u] “[name_m]Cas[/name_m]” - I have never been a fan of [name_m]Casper[/name_m], honestly. But I like [name_u]Linden[/name_u]. I suppose the combo is fine as a whole. But I’d probably like [name_u]Linden[/name_u] [name_m]Casper[/name_m] better.
[name_m]Amias[/name_m] [name_u]Luca[/name_u] or [name_m]Amias[/name_m] [name_m]Hawthorn[/name_m], “Ames” - [name_m]Amias[/name_m] [name_m]Hawthorn[/name_m]! I love [name_u]Luca[/name_u], but not in the middle spot. Besides, [name_m]Amias[/name_m] [name_m]Hawthorn[/name_m] sounds awesome!
[name_m]Clement[/name_m] [name_u]Pax[/name_u] - Feels a tad redundant to me. [name_m]Clement[/name_m] means “mild/merciful/gracious” and [name_u]Pax[/name_u] means “peace/calm”. Idk. But I don’t think the flow is great either.
[name_u]Laurence[/name_u] [name_m]Frey[/name_m], “[name_u]Ren[/name_u]; [name_u]Laurie[/name_u]” - [name_u]LOVE[/name_u]. Though I’d love [name_u]Laurence[/name_u] [name_u]Grey[/name_u]/[name_u]Gray[/name_u] even more. Both nicknames are great, though I prefer [name_u]Laurie[/name_u].
[name_m]Alexander[/name_m] [name_m]Idris[/name_m], “[name_u]Arlo[/name_u]; Aled” - This one is good, though I’m not really liking either of the nicknames for [name_m]Alexander[/name_m].
[name_u]Claude[/name_u] [name_u]Everest[/name_u] - Nms, but fine overall.
[name_m]Walter[/name_m] [name_u]True[/name_u], “[name_u]Wally[/name_u]” - I really like it! [name_u]True[/name_u] sounds bold, but not overly so, with gentle, traditional [name_m]Walter[/name_m], which is a nice balance. (Can’t say I love [name_u]Wally[/name_u], though, personally.)
[name_m]Julian[/name_m] [name_f]Somer[/name_f], “[name_u]Jules[/name_u]” - I like [name_m]Julian[/name_m] a lot; not sure how I feel about [name_f]Somer[/name_f]. But the flow is definitely good.
[name_m]Edwin[/name_m] [name_u]Lennox[/name_u] or [name_m]Edwin[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m], “[name_u]Win[/name_u]; [name_m]Ned[/name_m]” - I don’t generally care for [name_m]Edwin[/name_m], but I think [name_m]Edwin[/name_m] [name_u]Lennox[/name_u] is a handsome combo! [name_u]Love[/name_u] nn ‘[name_u]Win[/name_u]’!
[name_m]Alfred[/name_m] [name_u]Winter[/name_u], “[name_u]Alfie[/name_u]” - Not normally a fan of [name_u]Winter[/name_u], but I like it with [name_m]Alfred[/name_m]. This one is great!
[name_m]Rufus[/name_m] [name_u]Alden[/name_u] - Sorry, just not a fan.
[name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] [name_u]Kit[/name_u], “Tolly” - Really good! I think short and playful [name_u]Kit[/name_u] is the perfect mn for lengthy, serious [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m].
[name_m]Bernard[/name_m] [name_u]Isa[/name_u], “[name_m]Bear[/name_m]; [name_u]Berry[/name_u]” - Mmmm…not loving [name_u]Isa[/name_u], personally. [name_m]Bernard[/name_m] is fine, but not really my style.
[name_m]Walden[/name_m] [name_f]Sparrow[/name_f], “[name_u]Wally[/name_u]” - Not at all my style, but I definitely like it!
Favorites: [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] [name_u]Kit[/name_u] & [name_u]Laurence[/name_u] [name_m]Frey[/name_m] – Two thumbs up! 