Boy/unisex names you think should be exlusively for girls

I’ll start the list:

Townes
Bellamy
Navy
Arden

[name_u]Avery[/name_u]
[name_u]Shiloh[/name_u]
[name_u]Blair[/name_u]
[name_u]Emerson[/name_u]
[name_u]Haven[/name_u]
[name_u]Jamie[/name_u]
[name_u]Leighton[/name_u]

2 Likes

The only [name_u]Emerson[/name_u] I know is a 4 year old boy named specifically after Ralp [name_m]Waldo[/name_m] [name_u]Emerson[/name_u], i cannot imagine it on a little lady

I don’t have a lot of strong opinions on these, but [name_u]Vivian[/name_u], [name_u]Meredith[/name_u], and [name_u]Ashley[/name_u] come to mind for me as unisex names that I’d have personally trouble taking back out of the “girl camp,” as it were.

3 Likes

Yes I agree, these 3 and [name_u]Sasha[/name_u] I cannot see on boys though i know they are technically unisex

@itsjustjack

This might be a bit more unusual of a unisex name, but I think [name_u]Alexis[/name_u] is a feminine name. In European countries, [name_u]Alexis[/name_u] is primarily a male name, while in [name_u]America[/name_u] [name_u]Alexis[/name_u] is primarily feminine. I see [name_u]Alexis[/name_u] as a feminine name and I think it would better suit a girl than a boy.

1 Like

none! to elaborate, i’m not a super fan of boy names on girls, especially exclusively for girls. some names i like better on girls are blair and clare, but i don’t think they (or any gender neutral names) should only be girl names. they can easily be both!

1 Like