Brothers?

[name_f]Do[/name_f] you think the following sibsets can work as brothers?
• [name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] [name_m]Warren[/name_m] ([name_m]David[/name_m] & Tolly{tall-ee})
• [name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & [name_m]Wolfgang[/name_m] [name_m]Ross[/name_m] ([name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Wolf[/name_m])
• [name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & [name_m]Gideon[/name_m] [name_m]Robert[/name_m] ([name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Gideon[/name_m])
• [name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & Reid [name_u]Francis[/name_u] ([name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_u]Reid[/name_u])
• [name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & [name_m]Geoffrey[/name_m] Castle ([name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Geo[/name_m] {jee-oh})
• [name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & [name_m]Christian[/name_m] [name_m]Ross[/name_m] ([name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Christian[/name_m])

[name_f]Do[/name_f] you think it would be weird to use the name [name_m]Christian[/name_m] if I’m not a [name_m]Christian[/name_m]?

[name_f]Do[/name_f] you think the following sibsets can work as brothers?

I have bolded my fave sibsets below.

I like these pairings due to their Biblical lineage.

[name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] [name_m]Warren[/name_m]
[name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & [name_m]Gideon[/name_m] [name_m]Robert[/name_m]

I like these two sibsets because they’re old names with a similar style.

[name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & [name_m]Geoffrey[/name_m] Castle
[name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & [name_m]Christian[/name_m] [name_m]Ross[/name_m]

[name_m]Don[/name_m]'t like…

• [name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & [name_m]Wolfgang[/name_m] [name_m]Ross[/name_m] ([name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Wolf[/name_m]) - [name_m]David[/name_m] is pretty tame compared to [name_m]Wolfgang[/name_m]
• [name_m]David[/name_m] [name_m]Walter[/name_m] & Redi [name_u]Francis[/name_u] ([name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_u]Reid[/name_u]) - both end in “d”

[name_f]Do[/name_f] you think it would be weird to use the name [name_m]Christian[/name_m] if I’m not a [name_m]Christian[/name_m]? Somewhat weird but I’m sure you wouldn’t be the first to do so. :slight_smile:

These are the ones I think work:
[name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] ([name_m]David[/name_m] & Tolly) ([name_u]Love[/name_u] Batholomew!)
[name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Gideon[/name_m] ([name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Gideon[/name_m]) ([name_u]Love[/name_u] [name_m]Gideon[/name_m]!)
[name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Geoffrey[/name_m] ([name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Geo[/name_m])
[name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Christian[/name_m] ( [name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Christian[/name_m])
And I agree with [name_u]Mischa[/name_u] about [name_m]David[/name_m] & [name_m]Wolfgang[/name_m]/[name_u]Reid[/name_u] (although I like both names, especially [name_m]Wolfgang[/name_m])

Seeing how many people use [name_m]Christian[/name_m] and aren’t [name_m]Christian[/name_m], it’s starting to be normal, and not so weird. Plus there’s no guarantee [name_m]Christian[/name_m] would want to be/remain a [name_m]Christian[/name_m] even if his parents were.

With the exception of [name_m]Wolfgang[/name_m], I think your names work great with [name_m]David[/name_m].

I really like the combo of [name_m]David[/name_m] and [name_u]Reid[/name_u].

I agree with myosotis and southern.maple.

[name_f]My[/name_f] top 3 would be -

[name_m]David[/name_m] and [name_m]Gideon[/name_m]
[name_m]David[/name_m] and [name_m]Geoffrey[/name_m]
[name_m]David[/name_m] and [name_m]Christian[/name_m]