[name_f]Esme[/name_f] - [name_f]Esme[/name_f] is sweet, and I like how soft sounding it is. I think it’s classic and elegant, but it might be getting trendier because I’ve seen it being bounced around Nameberry a lot recently!
[name_u]Ruby[/name_u] - [name_u]Ruby[/name_u] is pretty. It has the magical vibe given off by a gem name, but is still fairly classic, which I think is your style, so I like that balance.
[name_f]Amy[/name_f] - Honestly, [name_f]Amy[/name_f] feels overused and overdone to me. Maybe not so much [name_f]Gen[/name_f] Z, but the generations before have had heaps of Amys so I think I’ve had a lot of overexposure.
[name_f]Elodie[/name_f] - I love the way [name_f]Elodie[/name_f] sounds, it’s lovely.
[name_f]Naomi[/name_f] - [name_f]Naomi[/name_f] is gorgeous! It’s so sweet and feminine, my best friend in kinder was named [name_f]Naomi[/name_f].
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] - I love the name [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] so much. I feel like it’s such a timeless, feminine name that has a lot of spunk and creative vibes behind it - I’m also forever reminded of the 90s queens [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] Buffay (Friends) and [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] Halliwell (Charmed).
[name_f]Iris[/name_f] - [name_f]Iris[/name_f] is really sweet, but I would personally use it as a middle. I can’t put my finger on why, I think I just picture a grandmother? [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f] is lovely though.
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] - [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] is sweet and classic, and there’s also [name_f]Lucie[/name_f] (which I personally prefer). I do feel it has been a bit overdone though.
[name_f]Elise[/name_f] - Hmm… I don’t think I’m a fan of this one! It feels a bit outdated to me.
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] - This is pretty! Conjures wonderful imagery, starry and magical to me. [name_f]Stella[/name_f] is a cute nickname.
[name_f]Esther[/name_f] - It doesn’t do a lot for me, but I like that it’s a bit spunky, even it feels old-fashioned.
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] - I’m not a fan of this at all, I think (sorry I sound like a broken record) it’s been done too many times and it’s outdated.
[name_f]Violet[/name_f] - I love the name [name_f]Violet[/name_f]! Sweet and feminine, but still spunky and strong.
[name_f]Juliet[/name_f] - Such a romantic, sweet, soft sounding name. Definitely a classic.
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] - I’ve noticed [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] is rising back up through the ranks! Unfortunately, it feels (to me) like it belongs back in the older generations. It isn’t my style, but I do like the flow.
[name_f]Isabel[/name_f] - I like that it isn’t [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f]; I’ve met too many Isabelles. I think [name_f]Isabel[/name_f] is a really lovely alternative, and feels spunkier while maintaining that classic sweetness.
[name_f]Faye[/name_f] - [name_f]Faye[/name_f] is light and refreshing, and I love the meaning (it’s so cute!).
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] - I love [name_f]Rose[/name_f] as a nickname or middle name, but not so much as a full first name, just because I’ve heard it too many times. I’ll drop alternatives in my suggestions!
[name_f]Jasmine[/name_f] - [name_f]Jasmine[/name_f] is beautiful, I love the princess connotations - regal and elegant, but spunky enough to kick your butt!
[name_f]Sarah[/name_f] - [name_f]Sarah[/name_f] is a shortened form of my mother’s name, so I’m very much biased.
[name_f]Hannah[/name_f] - [name_f]Hannah[/name_f] is alright. It’s sweet, but doesn’t stick out to me.
Suggestions:
[name_f]Opal[/name_f]
[name_f]Ethel[/name_f]
[name_f]Melody[/name_f]
[name_u]Eloise[/name_u]
[name_f]Ivy[/name_f]
[name_f]Alyssa[/name_f]
[name_u]Piper[/name_u]
[name_f]Prudence[/name_f]
[name_f]Holly[/name_f]
[name_f]Isadora[/name_f]
[name_f]Rosalie[/name_f]
[name_f]Roslyn[/name_f]
[name_f]Rosalyn[/name_f]
[name_f]Roselyn[/name_f]
[name_f]Eve[/name_f]
[name_f]Lydia[/name_f]
[name_f]Noelle[/name_f]
[name_f]Briar[/name_f]
[name_f]Aurora[/name_f]
[name_f]Aurelia[/name_f]
[name_f]Rachel[/name_f]
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f]
[name_f]Francesca[/name_f] “[name_u]Frankie[/name_u]”
[name_f]Daphne[/name_f]
[name_f]Cordelia[/name_f]