[name]Ever[/name] since I went off of [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Eliora[/name] [name]Lou[/name], I’ve been looking for a replacement, and I’ve just come across this. Thoughts? I’m not sure this is “it”, but I’m really liking it, and I’ve been wanting to get to [name]Lydia[/name] for a while… [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name] “[name]Kit[/name]”–wdyt?
I like the syllable count of [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Eliora[/name] [name]Lou[/name] better, but I like [name]Eve[/name] more than [name]Lou[/name]. [name]Love[/name] [name]Kit[/name] as a nn for [name]Catherine[/name]. [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name] seems a little choppy, but I like the combo.
I’d go for [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name] since I’d rather pass on the perhaps too unique [name]Eliora[/name] and the more masculine [name]Lou[/name]. Why don’t you consider having the second middle be one syllable since it would flow better? What do you think about the underused [name]Louisa[/name] as well?
I love this combo! [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name] is swoon worthy. [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Eliora[/name] [name]Lou[/name] feels all over the place, while [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name] feels very solid. [name]Love[/name] it.
Its very pretty! It has a better flow than [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Eliora[/name] [name]Lou[/name]. Also I agree with aj_bear that it feels more solid. [name]Kit[/name] is very cute too!
I like it, a lot, but my big question is: what will happen to [name]Eva[/name] if you put [name]Eve[/name] in the middle? Cause I love [name]Eva[/name]… But [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name] is pretty close to perfection.
Oh, it wouldn’t go anywhere. [name]Rachel[/name] [name]Evangeline[/name] [name]Clara[/name] was on my list long before [name]Eva[/name] was. I probably won’t use [name]Eve[/name], [name]Eva[/name], and [name]Evangeline[/name], but for now it doesn’t bother me too much.
Ooh [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name] is really sweet! I loved [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Eliora[/name] [name]Lou[/name], but [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name] is just gorgeous! I think it is so much classier and so much more you
Thanks, ladies! It’s not too much P&P, is it? And the two more frivolous sisters! I adore the book, and I like the connection to [name]Jane[/name] [name]Austen[/name] with [name]Catherine[/name] and [name]Lydia[/name], I just want to make sure people wouldn’t expect her to be as frivolous, flighty, and, quite honestly, dumb as [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Bennet[/name]. [name]Kitty[/name] wasn’t quite so bad as [name]Lydia[/name], but still.
I adore it! It’s absolutely beautiful and the flow is amazing. I definitely like it better than [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Eliora[/name] [name]Lou[/name].
And och, [name]Sarah[/name], I forgot to mention [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Eva[/name] [name]Lydia[/name]. I do really love it, and I think it’s gorgeous. I think I like the look of it even more than [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name]. But I love the feeling of [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name], and I feel like it flows better, although I’m not sure [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] [name]Eve[/name] sounds any better with my surname than [name]Catherine[/name] [name]Eva[/name] [name]Lydia[/name].
I really love the [name]Eva[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] part, though–now I’m wondering if I shouldn’t consider [name]Eva[/name] [name]Lydia[/name] something-or-other for my [name]Eva[/name] combo, instead of [name]Eva[/name] [name]Felicity[/name] or [name]Eva[/name] [name]Clara[/name].