[name_u]Holly[/name_u]!
I think [name_u]Holly[/name_u] is a very festive, sweet, eccentric name. She’s really rare among kids these days but has all the qualities that make a current name- nickname, dated vintage charm, wearability, and she’s also a nature name. [name_u]Super[/name_u] warm and cute!
For a middle using your list, I would choose [name_u]Holly[/name_u] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] because I think the longer, classic, more elegant middle balances out the snappiness of [name_u]Holly[/name_u]. I also think your other middle choices are a little too wordy with [name_u]Holly[/name_u]- so [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] works best in my opinion.
I choose [name_f]Lily[/name_f]. I’ve always liked [name_f]Lily[/name_f] - it just feels like such a sweet, happy name, and I’ve always liked L names a lot for some reason.
For middle names, I like to put [name_f]Lily[/name_f] with something longer/more syllables, so I’d probably go with [name_f]Lily[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] or [name_f]Lily[/name_f] [name_f]Aurora[/name_f].
I couldn’t pick between [name_u]Holly[/name_u] and [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f], both feel unexpected and underused and have such happy, fun, sassy vibes.
[name_u]Holly[/name_u] [name_f]Elinor[/name_f] or [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Lyra[/name_f]
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] is my choice. I’ve always liked it. It’s visually very interesting and I like how each element is spelt in a non-phonetic way, but it’s common enough that I wouldn’t worry too much about spelling difficulties. It’s short and spunky and has a lot of energy, but at the same time it’s an intelligent name (thanks to its spelling, I think) and would grow up very well.
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] would be lovely