I saw this combo: [name_u]James[/name_u] [name_m]Christopher[/name_m]
[name_f]Do[/name_f] you guys see it as a classic or as a boring option? I am curious to know
3 Likes
[name_m]Classic[/name_m] and timeless!
1 Like
Not boring, but not my favorite
1 Like
Both. Nice, classic, but also boring to me.
2 Likes
I think It’s classic, but not the most interesting, not boring, more just not my style.
1 Like
It’s nice, but it’s commonality doesn’t do it favors
3 Likes
I would say its both. Its a strong, solid classic name. Not imaginative or noteworthy (both in a good or bad way)
I’m a sucker for the more common names, so personally I love it! They’re handsome, classic, timeless and charming to me! They’re popular choices, sure, but I don’t think that makes them ‘boring’. Safe maybe, but not necessarily boring.
Both?
Objectively, it’s totally classic, very solid, very timeless - could suit a lot of people, offers up nickname opportunities etc.
Personally, I find the name [name_u]James[/name_u] very bland and dull. [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] adds a bit of kick though.
As I say, objectively, it’s a good choice
1 Like
Totally classic and utterly charming—especially with [name_u]James[/name_u] in the FN spot. Is it the most exciting and fresh? Well, no. But does that make it any less lovely and meaningful? Not at all! Two absolutely delightful names.
1 Like
Both!
[name_u]James[/name_u] is one of my favourite names - I love saying it, it’s super handsome to me, and it’s actually not that common among the youngsters (as far as I can tell, it hasn’t been in the top 20 boys’ names in Australia for eg for a while). Switching it to [name_m]Christopher[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u] (or Christo), could be an option for something a little more spunky! But it may not be as popular where you are anyway.
I’d say it’s classic. They are both sophisticated names and go nicely and interestingly together. They aren’t my all time favorite names, but I wouldn’t say this combination is boring.
I love [name_u]James[/name_u]! I think it flows nicely with [name_m]Christopher[/name_m]. I wouldn’t say it’s boring but it’s also not the most exciting name, which isn’t a bad thing I mean not everyone needs a super unique name for their child! It’s always pleasant to see a timeless and solid name for a baby boy!
1 Like
Yawn
Classic!
I think James Christopher is gorgeous and really refreshing to see amongst lots of names that are about nowadays where most parents are battling it out to be the most unique baby namer on the block. James is lovely timeless, classic, wholesome and has this laid back friendly feel. I think Christopher makes a lovely middle name. Very handsome.
[name_m]Classic[/name_m] for sure
it’s very classic, just not really my style!
[name_m]Christopher[/name_m] is too [name_u]Christian[/name_u] for me, but it will be classically soft and delightful for everyone who likes this style.
I’ve met MANY people with this exact combo, but it’s very handsome 
1 Like
[name_m]Classic[/name_m] and handsome!