I often think of nature names as pretty and elegant but I am wondering if there are some nature names that do not fit this stereotype. Are there any nature names that are so clunky that [name_f]Maud[/name_f] looks like [name_f]Lily[/name_f] and [name_f]Agnes[/name_f] like [name_f]Anabelle[/name_f]? Or are all nature names dainty and pretty?
Personally I think [name_f]Lark[/name_f] is weird and sounds a bit clunky and [name_f]Hebe[/name_f] sounds silly and reminds me of the ‘heebie jeebies’ ><
[name_m]Hawk[/name_m], [name_u]Falcon[/name_u], [name_f]Lark[/name_f], and maybe [name_f]Daffodil[/name_f].
I’ve always found [name_f]Petunia[/name_f] sorta clunky. [name_f]Opal[/name_f] is something I see being in a sibset with [name_f]Maud[/name_f]. [name_m]Pike[/name_m] and [name_f]Garland[/name_f] are odd to me as well.
[name_f]Hazel[/name_f] is definitely clunky.