@tigermama527 - It’s said like [name_m]BO[/name_m]-az. [name_m]Long[/name_m] “O” as in [name_m]Joseph[/name_m], short “A” as in “apple”.
@pacifica - in short, the story starts with [name_f]Naomi[/name_f] and Elimelech, a Hebrew family that moves to a neighboring territory because of a drought in [name_m]Israel[/name_m]. Their two sons marry local women, one of which is [name_f]Ruth[/name_f]. Elimelech dies (I’m not sure what from), and then consequently, their two sons pass away, too, without giving heirs. In [name_m]Israel[/name_m], it would have been tradition for [name_f]Naomi[/name_f] to marry their closest kinsman and provide another son for either [name_f]Ruth[/name_f], or the other daughter-in-law, [name_f]Orpah[/name_f], to marry. Of course, this would take forever, and [name_f]Naomi[/name_f], being kind of heart, tried to send her two daughters-in-law back to their families, because she was old and had nothing to offer them. [name_f]Orpah[/name_f] agrees, but [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] refuses, giving this eloquent speech that is often quoted: “Wherever you go, I will go, your people will be my people, and your God, my God…” That’s not it word-for-word, but it’s close. So [name_f]Naomi[/name_f] and [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] return to [name_m]Israel[/name_m], and [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] takes care of her mother-in-law, and soon after they arrive, she goes to glean in the fields to provide food for them (widows and such were permitted to follow behind the harvesters and pick up the meager remnants of the crop, and that is what they would take home). The first day [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] did this, [name_m]Boaz[/name_m] was completely taken by her beauty and kindness and selflesness and grace. He had heard what she did for her mother-in-law, and went out of his way to care for her. (Basically, he had a crush. It was adorable. :)) When [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] returned to [name_f]Naomi[/name_f] with way much more grain than either of them had expected, [name_f]Naomi[/name_f] wanted to know who in the world owned the land that she gleaned on, and when she found out it was [name_m]Boaz[/name_m] (a near kinsman of theirs), she gave [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] special instructions, and I don’t know how to explain all the cultural information and everything, but it was found out that there was a nearer kinsman, and yet [name_m]Boaz[/name_m] “redeemed” (a very charged, religious word, I know, but he loved her, and he is basically making the great gesture here, to have a chance at a life with her) her. They had a son, [name_m]Obed[/name_m], together, and [name_m]Boaz[/name_m] and [name_f]Ruth[/name_f] are in the direct lineage of [name_m]Jesus[/name_m]. I can’t really do it justice–it’s just a really beautiful story, and even if you don’t believe the Bible, I think it’s worth the read. It’s such a good story.
I love that everyone else loves the Bible story! I feel like I have a very personal connection to it, with my grandmother and all, but it just seems so crazy.
le sigh. I’m still giving it thought. It probably doesn’t hurt that after about a year, I still don’t have one [name_m]Boaz[/name_m] combo I’m super excited about, so it’s easier to just let it go. I don’t really like it as a middle, either, so I don’t know. I don’t know that I want to lose [name_m]Bo[/name_m]/[name_m]Beau[/name_m], though, and I am not sure I like it too much on its own, or as a nn for anything else? I suppose I could do [name_m]Brody[/name_m] nn [name_m]Beau[/name_m]/[name_m]Bo[/name_m], but [name_m]Brody[/name_m] is already a diminutive–does it need its own nn?