[name_u]Love[/name_u] [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f] after the Beatles song Dizzy Miss [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f]. [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] is just ok for me. [name_m]How[/name_m] about [name_f]Elise[/name_f]?
I think it’s too assumed that all [name_f]Lizzie[/name_f]'s are [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f]'s (or maybe [name_f]Lisette[/name_f] once in a blue moon). I say it works as a small , stretch, so I vote yes. if you really love [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f], since it’s not very well suited to be a standalone name.
I think this is a reach, but totally worth it.
[name_f]My[/name_f] name is [name_f]Elise[/name_f]. I vote no, it doesn’t work, but that’s just because I have never, in any way whatsoever been a [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f]. [name_f]My[/name_f] close friends call me [name_f]Lise[/name_f] (less) sometimes, but that’s it. [name_f]Lissie[/name_f] works, but I don’t think [name_f]Elise[/name_f] has any super intuitive nicknames.
I think it would be OK. It’s not the absolute most intuitive nickname, but it’s a lot less of a stretch than many.
It doesn’t work for me, because the sounds aren’t there, but then again, I’m picky. [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f]/[name_f]Lizzie[/name_f] works fine on it’s own though.
I think it could work, [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f] could really work for any name that Lissy could be a nn for, I really like the idea of [name_f]Felicity[/name_f] nn [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f].
I don’t think it works very well. If you like [name_f]Lizzie[/name_f] then what about that as a first name instead of a nickname. You could also pair it up with a middle and call her by both, ex: [name_f]Lizzie[/name_f] [name_f]Mae[/name_f].
[name_f]My[/name_f] thought exactly.
I don’t think so… an [name_f]Elise[/name_f] could be a [name_f]Lissie[/name_f]. Maybe [name_f]Lizette[/name_f] or [name_f]Eliza[/name_f]?
I think that because they’re the same amount of syllables, it doesn’t make much sense for an [name_f]Elise[/name_f] to be a [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f] when they don’t have that much in common anyway.
[name_f]Ellie[/name_f], [name_f]Elle[/name_f], Leesy, Lees or even Lissy, but not [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f] for me.
I think [name_f]Lissie[/name_f] is better than [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f], but I think [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f] works fine. If that’s what you call her, then people will follow suit. Heck, if Johns can be nicknamed [name_m]Jack[/name_m] and the world’s been fine with that for this long, I say go with it!
A BIG stretch. No.
I don’t think it’s a “big” stretch at all. If [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] can be a [name_f]Betty[/name_f] and [name_f]Libby[/name_f], why can’t [name_f]Elise[/name_f] be [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f]? That said, I do think it’s better suited for Lissy.
Have you considered [name_f]Eliza[/name_f] or just plain [name_f]Liza[/name_f]? [name_m]Both[/name_m] of those easily work for [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f]. I also agree that [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f] can work on its own, though I’d probably give her a double-barrel name, like [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f]-[name_f]Kate[/name_f] or [name_f]Lizzy[/name_f]-[name_f]Rose[/name_f].
Sure, but it’s not much of an improvement. I’d opt for [name_f]Elle[/name_f].