made me laugh (the melodrama of “Dealbreaker?”) but the more I think of it, the more it makes me feel bothered.
Not urgently or meanly or anything, but here’s why.
No one is going to mistake a child for a dog or vice versa just because they share the same name.
It is not as if you chose an 8 year old dog to adopt after giving birth to your child only to find out they were both called [name_f]Alice[/name_f].
It is not as if a million dogs and children and adults are not named this name you love.
It is not as if the name is somehow sullied by belonging to a relative’s animal. Or is it for you?
Back in the day, animals (pets) were frequently called Fido and Rover and Spot and the like. They were not necessarily spayed or neutered or brought to the vet or safely fenced or allowed in the house. Some were treated humanely, but many were not.
Nowadays in this country, many animals have it better than that. Sometimes called companion animals, they tend to be given better medical care and more attention. Many come inside. And many share human names. I know a poodle named [name_m]Luc[/name_m], a lab named [name_f]Mollee[/name_f], and a greyhound named [name_f]Jenn[/name_f]. I don’t know a Spot or a Fido, though it would be fine if I did.
But I do think that this big trend of naming companion animals human names, now human-animal names, does reflect our evolving respect for these loving beings.
And I wouldn’t hesitate to name a son [name_m]Luc[/name_m] or a daughter [name_f]Jenn[/name_f], if I liked the names.
PS If you were only kidding about the whole deal breaker thing, joke’s on me!