Text deleted.
I’ve never thought of [name_m]Coby[/name_m] as a nickname for [name_m]Jacob[/name_m], but I love it! [name_m]Coby[/name_m] [name_m]Banks[/name_m] is nice, but I also don’t think [name_m]Jake[/name_m] [name_m]Banks[/name_m] is that bad.
I like [name_m]Caleb[/name_m] with the nickname [name_m]Cale[/name_m] too, although I prefer [name_m]Caleb[/name_m] in full. I do see the “[name_f]Cayla[/name_f] [name_m]Banks[/name_m]” thing, and I think [name_m]Caleb[/name_m] “[name_m]Cale[/name_m]” [name_m]Banks[/name_m] is the perfect way to avoid the problem.
I love [name_m]Coby[/name_m] as a nickname for [name_m]Jacob[/name_m] over [name_m]Jake[/name_m], but it sounds like the character from the kid’s movie Agent [name_u]Cody[/name_u] [name_m]Banks[/name_m].
Both are great! I think [name_m]Jacoby[/name_m] nn [name_m]Coby[/name_m] is a bit more intuitive but if you’re set on just [name_m]Jacob[/name_m] then [name_m]Coby[/name_m] still totally works. It’s also quite refreshing to hear [name_m]Coby[/name_m] being used over [name_m]Jake[/name_m]