We are trying to decide between [name_m]Will[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] or [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] & have listed possible middle name options for each. Please share which you prefer & why! Also open to any additional suggestions. I should note my husband’s name is not [name_m]John[/name_m] or [name_m]Jack[/name_m]. [name_m]Will[/name_m] also note our daughter’s name is Myers [name_f]Grace[/name_f]. Thanks for your input!
My favorites for you are [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Turner[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] or [name_m]William[/name_m] [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] “[name_m]Jack[/name_m]”! I don’t love [name_u]Jackson[/name_u] (nothing to do with the son of part, I just don’t love the name!), but I think Myers and [name_m]Jack[/name_m] go great together.
I still love [name_m]Rhodes[/name_m] and think that [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] sounds better than [name_m]Will[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m]. [name_m]Jack[/name_m](son) [name_m]Rhodes[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] gets my vote.
After [name_m]Rhodes[/name_m], [name_m]Turner[/name_m] is my second favorite with either [name_m]Jack[/name_m], [name_u]Jackson[/name_u], or [name_m]William[/name_m].
Jack [name_m]Turner[/name_m] is lovely! I’d go [name_m]Jack[/name_m] over [name_u]Jackson[/name_u] if you’re looking to use a surname-type name as a middle, otherwise it’s basically three surnames.
Of the [name_m]William[/name_m] combos, [name_m]William[/name_m] [name_m]Rhodes[/name_m] is my favourite
William [name_m]Rhodes[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] is the perfect bro to Myers [name_f]Grace[/name_f]! [name_m]Will[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] has better flow than [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] imo. [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Turner[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] is a strong contender. [name_m]Turner[/name_m] with either fn is great.
I like [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_u]Bennett[/name_u] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m]! [name_f]My[/name_f] second choice would be [name_m]William[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m].
I like [name_m]William[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u] or [name_m]William[/name_m] [name_m]Rhodes[/name_m].
For me, it’s the repeating -ck with [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] (or [name_u]Jackson[/name_u] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m]) that I’m not crazy about. But if I had to choose between [name_m]Jack[/name_m] and [name_u]Jackson[/name_u], I’d go with [name_u]Jackson[/name_u] to break up the -ck -ck a bit more.
William [name_m]Rhodes[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] is still my favorite. [name_f]My[/name_f] favorite of the [name_m]Jack[/name_m] combos is [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_u]Bennett[/name_u] or [name_u]Jackson[/name_u] [name_m]Rhodes[/name_m].
I prefer [name_m]Jack[/name_m] to [name_u]Jackson[/name_u], and [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_u]Bennett[/name_u] and [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Turner[/name_m] both sound quite nice. For some reason when I read [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] is does make me think of the late musician [name_m]Jeff[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m], but that’s a good association in my book and also probably not one a lot of people would have.
William [name_m]Turner[/name_m] just makes me think of [name_m]Orlando[/name_m] [name_f]Bloom[/name_f]’s character from the Pirate of the Caribbean series and for people who know his middke, that seems like it would likely be a orevalent association. I do like [name_m]William[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]! Since you wrote it as [name_m]William[/name_m] “[name_m]Jack[/name_m]” I’m assuming that option is naming him [name_m]William[/name_m] but calling him [name_m]Jack[/name_m]? If you meant it as a middle, [name_m]William[/name_m] [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] sounds nice.
Imo the best of both here would be [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]William[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m].
I came in here to vote for [name_m]Jack[/name_m], but [name_m]William[/name_m] [name_m]Rhodes[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] is too handsome to ignore!
I personally like [name_u]Jackson[/name_u] [name_m]Ford[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m]! Normally I’d prefer just [name_m]Jack[/name_m], but I think [name_u]Jackson[/name_u] goes far better with Myers. I also like [name_m]Ford[/name_m] because I think it blends the best without being too surnamey. I love [name_m]Wright[/name_m] too, but [name_u]Jackson[/name_u] [name_m]Wright[/name_m] [name_m]Buckley[/name_m] was a little too surname heavy. I think [name_u]Jackson[/name_u] “[name_m]Jack[/name_m]” and Myers work really well together, though, so that’s my vote!
not a big fan of [name_u]Jackson[/name_u] personally. Your daughter’s name is lovely btw!