Ooh, darn. I would have said for sure [name_u]Seneca[/name_u], but [name_u]Seneca[/name_u] Samuall… I don’t know. For me, that’s a little too much on the alliterative side.
And I really love [name_f]Allegra[/name_f], too. It was one of my first name-loves way back when, and then when that darn allergy medication came out and I saw a commercial for it, I was so bummed!! It’s a beautiful name and never should have been used for a drug. Ugh. For me, the drug thing is a deal-breaker. For me. If you’re sure it won’t bother you, then it should stay in the running.
[name_f]Alexandra[/name_f] and [name_f]Aria[/name_f] really don’t do it for me.
Now I’m starting to second-guess myself about the alliteration thing with [name_u]Seneca[/name_u]… maybe it’s a non-issue. It really is a great first name.
[name_f]One[/name_f] thing to keep in mind is that while you have some lovely middle names on your list ([name_f]Violet[/name_f], [name_f]Juliet[/name_f], [name_f]Genevieve[/name_f], [name_u]Aberdeen[/name_u]), the 3-3-3 syllable pattern for first, middle, last doesn’t have the best ring to it. If that matters at all to you.
The only name I absolutely do not like is [name_u]Emerson[/name_u], even in the middle spot. It’s trendy in the worst way, to me. Surname-name, masculine (means “son of [name_u]Emery[/name_u]”) pretending to be unisex when really it’s not— I just can’t get behind it in any way, shape, or form.
Anyway. I couldn’t vote because my favorite combo wasn’t on the poll—I like [name_u]Seneca[/name_u] [name_u]June[/name_u]. If [name_f]Rose[/name_f] isn’t a family name, it just feels like “filler” to me. [name_m]Even[/name_m] though it does sound lovely with [name_u]Seneca[/name_u].