I love [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]! [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f] is fine, but [name_f]Grace[/name_f] is a very ‘filler’ mn in the U.S. If it’s a family name or has specifically special meaning to you, go for it. If not, [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] [name_f]Louise[/name_f] is way more interesting.
Other ideas:
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] [name_f]Amelia[/name_f]
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] [name_f]Cecilia[/name_f]
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] [name_f]Cecily[/name_f]
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] [name_f]Daisy[/name_f]-This is on my list!
Like michellem said, [name_f]Grace[/name_f] gets used as ‘filler’ middle name a lot. It’s beautiful and I love it, and I’ve been wanting to use it to honour a beloved family member… but it just feels like there are so many already! [name_f]Isla[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f], [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f], [name_f]Emily[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f]…
So although both are beautiful, if you like [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] [name_f]Louise[/name_f] just as much then I’d go with that one, just cause it’s a bit different!
[name_f]Grace[/name_f] and [name_f]Louise[/name_f] both sound good with [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] but both are default middle names in that they are often and automatically used. [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] is more interesting and unexpected than [name_f]Louise[/name_f].