Emilia Margaret Rowan or Emilia Rowan Margaret

[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u] or [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] which is better

[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u] has an excellent flow!
It sound nice either way but the 4-3-2 arrangement is definitely my preference.

[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u]

[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] to me sounds much better, much more modern elegance

I prefer [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f].

Gorgeous names! I prefer [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u]. Maybe deciding which middle initial you would like her to use most often on occasions/forms where the second middle is eliminated might help you decide which you want to put second.

[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u]

They both flow well. I went back and fourth on which one I think flows slightly better, ended up going with [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f].

I like [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u]. The syllables flow well together, and I like how each name subtly picks up the sound of the next: Emilia Margaret Rowan.

[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_u]Rowan[/name_u] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] is lovely!