Emma Rosalind Phoebe?

Girl Names
1

I’d love to hear your thoughts on [name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] as a combo!

All opinions are appreciated though it’d be great if you, just for a few minutes, could forget about [name_f]Emma[/name_f]'s popularity and focus simply on the sound and look :slight_smile:

PS. [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] is [name_f]Roz[/name_f]-a-lind.

2

Gorgeous! I love [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] and [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f].

3

[name_u]Love[/name_u] it!! Those names work well together

4

It sounds marvelous! The flow is spot on. I also think the names complement one another decently, especially [name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f]. It think there might be second middles that would fit better than [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f], but it sounds great as it is. Great job!

5

@lavender & jo jo, thank you :slight_smile:

@larkbub101 I’m open to suggestion for a different second middle name; I do love [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] but would be interested to hear what you have in mind!

6

I think it’s absolutely stunning! The names complement each other very well, and the whole flows great together.

7

I like it! Very pretty! Personally I think I would do something like [name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosemary[/name_f] [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] just because I like how the vowels compliment each other better in that, but I do love what you have too! :slight_smile:

8

I’d go with [name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f]. The [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] kind of doesn’t flow and it’s nicer sounding with just the two names.

9

@abertawe, just [name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] isn’t an option for me but thank you anyway.

10

I think it is a beautiful name, and all three names are individually beautiful. However, I agree with larkbub101, I think you could find something that fits a little better than [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f]. [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] is short and only two syllables, but it has such a lot of sound (does that make sense? All the eee, eee…)

I think a one-syllable name or a shorter, more clipped, two-syllable name might work better.

[name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_f]Faye[/name_f]
[name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f]
[name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]
[name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_f]Claire[/name_f]
[name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]
[name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_f]Eve[/name_f]
[name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_f]Ada[/name_f]
[name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_u]Kay[/name_u]

I really like [name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] [name_f]Blythe[/name_f] but I do still think your original combo is beautiful.