I love the names [name_f]Esther[/name_f] and [name_f]Ruth[/name_f]. However, there is a clear Biblical tie to both names that I don’t necessarily love because I’m not religous. I also love the names [name_f]Clara[/name_f], [name_f]Margot[/name_f], [name_f]Flora[/name_f]/[name_f]Florence[/name_f], [name_f]Willa[/name_f], [name_f]Edith[/name_f], [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f] “[name_f]Gwen[/name_f]”, and [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. [name_f]Do[/name_f] the names still stick out as religious when paired with some of the other names on my list, like a sibset of [name_f]Clara[/name_f], [name_f]Ruth[/name_f], [name_f]Esther[/name_f], [name_f]Margot[/name_f], and [name_f]Willa[/name_f]?
Let me know what you think!
I think in the set you mentioned above, for a while, yes, they’d stick out as they’d be #2 & #3 which makes [name_f]Clara[/name_f] stand out. However, if it were [name_f]Clara[/name_f], [name_f]Esther[/name_f], [name_f]Margot[/name_f], [name_f]Willa[/name_f] & [name_f]Ruth[/name_f], it’s really not that noticable. So, yes, use them together but maybe not one after the other.
I’ve never associated those names as very biblical or religious, so I don’t think you’ll have to worry very much about that. They pair very nicely with the others on your list.
I think they work well with the others on your list
(great choices by the way! [name_u]Love[/name_u] them!)
The Biblical stories are really cool even if you aren’t religious, so having that connection isn’t necessarily a bad thing imho.
Good luck!