Thoughts on [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] olive vs [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Maple[/name_f]
I would lean towards [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f]. I donโt care for the hard โaโ sound on [name_f]Maple[/name_f], I think it throws off the flow. If you want to go with [name_f]Maple[/name_f] I would advise adding a second middle, maybe something like [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Anne[/name_f] [name_f]Maple[/name_f].
[name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Maple[/name_f] is lovely! I like the blend of sounds best
[name_f]Love[/name_f] [name_f]Maple[/name_f]
[name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Maple[/name_f] is pretty for an autumn baby
[name_f]Maple[/name_f].
I like [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Maple[/name_f] better
[name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Maple[/name_f] gets my vote! [name_f]Olive[/name_f] has too many repeating sounds with [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f]
Oooh [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Maple[/name_f] is lovely! There was a member on here years and years ago who I believe used [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Wren[/name_f] (or maybe [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] Wren?) - itโs a great combo. [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] is nice, but [name_f]Maple[/name_f] feels more memorable. I donโt know that I love the repeated Vโs in [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f]? With my synesthesia I love the pop of magenta I get with [name_f]Maple[/name_f] next to [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] (who is more clears/whites/purples). [name_f]Olive[/name_f] is mostly an off-white for me, so [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] just doesnโt have a lot of memorable presence for me, but I do like the names individually.
Good luck!