This name just kinda fell into my lap today, and I am obsessed! [name]Francis[/name] is a family name for the men in my family, so it is a nod to them in a feminine form. Thoughts?
Not bad kind of cute, but I would switch it [name]Apple[/name] [name]Frances[/name] flows a bit better. Though I don’t know how you’d feel having a daughter named [name]Apple[/name].
I don’t care what the [name]Gwyneth[/name]-haters say, [name]Apple[/name] is the cutest!
It’s my number one guilty pleasure in terms of names right now, so [name]Frances[/name] [name]Apple[/name] is a definite thumbs up for me 
Contrary to sabrinafair I think [name]Frances[/name] [name]Apple[/name] flows better than [name]Apple[/name] [name]Frances[/name], especially when a surname is put into the equation. Plus, [name]Apple[/name] would be better in the middle spot because not everyone this world would look nicely upon it as a first name.
[name]Frances[/name] [name]Apple[/name] gives me “[name]France[/name]'s apple” 
I [name]LOVE[/name] and [name]ADORE[/name] [name]Frances[/name], and I don’t think [name]Apple[/name] is the worst name ever, but I don’t think I’d put a noun name with [name]Frances[/name], just because to me, it sounds like a possession.
My first thought was “that’s reminds me of [name]Fiona[/name] [name]Apple[/name]” though I guess that association won’t last forever.
I do prefer [name]Frances[/name] [name]Apple[/name] over [name]Apple[/name] [name]Frances[/name] though to me [name]Apple[/name] is a bit of a blunt force of “look at the fruit name I picked”.
I thought the same thing, sorry 
It feels like a type of [name]Apple[/name] rather than a person. I don’t like it.
Sounds a bit like [name]Fiona[/name] [name]Apple[/name], whom I love, so not a bad thing. If you want a fruit I like [name]Plum[/name] more. [name]Frances[/name] [name]Plum[/name] would be gorgeous.
This is the biggest problem to me. I also thought of [name]Fiona[/name] [name]Apple[/name], but I don’t really see that as an issue.
I actually think its a nice combination between classic and quirky. I admit as soon as I read [name]Apple[/name], I thought, oo, [name]Frances[/name] [name]Plum[/name] would be even better
Not a fan. I don’t like [name]Frances[/name] in the first place, plus as others have said, [name]Frances[/name] [name]Apple[/name] sounds more like a type of apple than a name, like “an apple of [name]France[/name].”
I don’t like it, sorry. I’ve never liked either name.
I am not a fan, sorry. [name]Apple[/name] is not a name I like… I am just reminded of a fruit. Food names on kids are not something I would do, but it’s your choice.
[name]Kinda[/name] like it! I do like quirky middles with classic first names- like others have mentioned, [name]Frances[/name] [name]Plum[/name] would work well too (both those names a deep, rich, purple-y colour to me- plum redder, frances a true violet…add that to the meaning of [name]Plum[/name] and it’s beyond perfect!).
I really like [name]Frances[/name] [name]Apple[/name]. To me it’s the perfect balance of serious and whimsical, vintage and modern.
[name]Frances[/name] is NMS, but I really like [name]Frances[/name] [name]Apple[/name]. Like others have suggested, [name]Frances[/name] [name]Plum[/name] is also cute.
I actually like it, and I like the flow of it the way you originally wrote it. I think thanks to [name]Gwyneth[/name] Paltrow people will recognize [name]Apple[/name] as a name, atlhough it is an unusual choice.