Is [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m] [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] too much? A bit pompous perhaps? I’ve also considered just [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m] or [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m]. I’d appreciate any opinions or impressions.
So [name_m]George[/name_m] and [name_m]Linus[/name_m] are two of my ultimate favorites. I also don’t like two middles as a general rule. [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m] is so fantastic on it’s own. [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m] [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] too much? It’s teetering on too much but I certainly wouldn’t think he or his parents were pompous. It might also might reallydepend on the last name how doable it is.
Yep. Too much, though all three names are great on their own.
[name_m]George[/name_m] and [name_m]Linus[/name_m] are fine, but I think [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] needs to be used with something strong and plain and only one middle name.
I must say, I agree with the others. [name_m]George[/name_m] is a guy in a perfectly-cut gray flannel suit, [name_m]Linus[/name_m] is wearing a brilliantly-striped [name_m]Hermes[/name_m] tie, and then [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] comes along and adds…blue suede boots? a red fedora? Something [name_m]George[/name_m] and [name_m]Linus[/name_m] just don’t need…
Let’s be real, he won’t be using his middle names a lot of the time. If you love the names and the combo (it is great btw) go for it!
I would leave it at [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m]. I like what [name_f]Pam[/name_f] said about [name_m]George[/name_m] and [name_m]Linus[/name_m], but [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] doesn’t add blue suede boots or a red fedora. He tries to pull his muddy overalls on over [name_m]George[/name_m]'s flannel suit to hop on his tractor and plow the fields for planting season.
I think it’s fantastic. No reason at all not to go all out on middle names. It’s not like they’re commonly used.
I like [name_m]Linus[/name_m] [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m]! All three together are a mouthful. But go with your gut!
@southernmaple, hilarious!
I really like it! [name_m]George[/name_m] and [name_m]Linus[/name_m] are two names that I really like and I also think [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] is super cool.
I just prefer one middle name, [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m] or [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] are already awesome names I think the extra name puts them over the top.
It would be too much for me, but I like all 3 names. [name_m]Just[/name_m] not a fan of two middles. [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] is nice as well as [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m].
It really depends. If I saw this name, I would assume [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] is a family name… and that you are maybe from the South. If that’s the case, it’s a cool name. If they are all just names you like, then it’s a whole lot of name. I do like [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m] though!
I have loved reading all your comments ( lol [name_f]Pam[/name_f] and southernmaple). I think I’ll stick with [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m]!
It seems like you’ve made a decision, so I’ll just agree with what the others said. For me it’s because [name_m]George[/name_m] does feel rather heavy and clunky still, and [name_m]Linus[/name_m] and [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] are rather old-fashioned and rarely used, so it almost seems like you’re deliberately trying to be cool by being “so out it’s in.” [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m] is great, and I hope you get to use [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] on a future son or pet!
[name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m] [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] has quite a lot going on (just like @pam said). [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] weighs [name_m]George[/name_m] and [name_m]Linus[/name_m] down. All three names are handsome, but [name_m]Beauregard[/name_m] doesn’t quite fit with the other two names. I think [name_m]George[/name_m] [name_m]Linus[/name_m] is a wonderful combination!