Okay another site helped us name them now were asking for your opinions.
[name]Eden[/name] [name]Natalie[/name] [name]Faith[/name] nn [name]Edie[/name]
[name]Addison[/name] [name]Lucy[/name] [name]Joy[/name] nn [name]Addy[/name]
[name]Mackenzie[/name] [name]Caroline[/name] [name]Hope[/name] nn Mie (like [name]Emme[/name]) and [name]Kay[/name] because [name]Mackenzie[/name] starts with M so were and theres a K in [name]Mackenzie[/name] don’t like [name]Mac[/name] or [name]Kenzie[/name].
[name]Brooklyn[/name] [name]Eva[/name] [name]Grace[/name] nn [name]Brooke[/name]
all have [name]Hope[/name], [name]Faith[/name], [name]Joy[/name] and [name]Grace[/name] for middle names. I realize [name]Eden[/name] [name]Natalie[/name] may not flow for some but its fine for us and I love the look and feel or [name]Natalie[/name] [name]Faith[/name]. Thanks!
Wow, you’re having four! So much naming fun.
These are some very nice names. I think [name]Eden[/name] [name]Natalie[/name] [name]Faith[/name] is my favourite.
The only one I really have issue with is [name]Mackenzie[/name]. I don’t think [name]Kay[/name] is really a viable nn for any name that just happens to have a letter K in it, especially when it isn’t pronounced as a capital letter [name]Kay[/name] sound. I’m a little confused about Mie too. [name]How[/name] is it pronounced? Like the capital letter M? or like ‘Me’? The way it’s spelt it should be pronounced most likely as ‘My’ or maybe as ‘Me.’
But I like that they all share a virtue name and I think [name]Eden[/name]/[name]Edie[/name], [name]Caroline[/name] and [name]Eva[/name] and [name]Natalie[/name], [name]Lucy[/name] ad Brookly/[name]Brooke[/name] all work very will with the other names you’ve chosen.
Wow! When you were posting before, I never picked up on the fact you were having quads! Congratulations, and what wonderful names you have chosen! However, I would change the order around:
To me, you definitely have a preference for unisex first names, right? That’s great! It bothers me a bit that [name]Eden[/name], [name]Addison[/name], and [name]Brooklyn[/name] all end in N, while [name]Mackenzie[/name] is a bit on her own. Also, each of these names (especially [name]Mackenzie[/name] and [name]Brooklyn[/name]) feels a bit dated to me, more 1990s to 2000s. I’m assuming that doesn’t bother you, but you asked for opinions. I agree that [name]Natalie[/name] [name]Faith[/name] is a very pretty combination - good choice!
I like the names well enough, but [name]Eden[/name] looks so left out! It is much shorter, more modern and to me just has a completely different feel than the others names. [name]Natalie[/name] [name]Eden[/name] [name]Faith[/name] would match much better with the others. Plus, two girls would have names ending in “en” and two in “ee”.
I do agree with [name]Lemon[/name] about some of the names being very dated. I think The middles you have chosen are fantastic, though and would make great names on their own!
[name]Eden[/name] [name]Natalie[/name] [name]Faith[/name]–This is a really lovely combo. I wouldnt suggest changing it.
[name]Addison[/name] [name]Lucy[/name] [name]Joy[/name]- I’m not a fan of [name]Addison[/name], it is to trendy for my taste. Plus it makes me think of Addisons disease which is an adrenal disorder.
[name]Mackenzie[/name] [name]Caroline[/name] [name]Hope[/name]- What about [name]Caroline[/name] [name]Mackenzie[/name] [name]Hope[/name]? I have a really hard time taking the name [name]Mackenzie[/name] seriously. It has always sounded a little childish and young imo, sorry. Plus I think it dates the name to the early 2000’s/late 90s.
[name]Brooklyn[/name] [name]Eva[/name] [name]Grace[/name]- I’ve never loved [name]Brooklyn[/name] because it is more of a place and not so much a name to me. [name]Brooke[/name] is lovely, sweet, and I think ties in well with sister [name]Eden[/name].
I would suggest changing the order to:
[name]Eden[/name] [name]Natalie[/name] [name]Faith[/name]
[name]Addison[/name] [name]Lucy[/name] [name]Joy[/name]- Although [name]Lucy[/name] [name]Addison[/name] [name]Joy[/name] would be nice too!
[name]Caroline[/name] [name]Eva[/name] [name]Grace[/name]
[name]Brooke[/name] [name]Mackenzie[/name] [name]Hope[/name]
Also, have you considered using [name]Natalie[/name] as a fn? It is a beautiful name and I could see [name]Eden[/name], [name]Natalie[/name], and [name]Brooke[/name] together.
Naming 4 girls - now that’s quite an endeavor! Here’s my opinions fwiw
I agree with the pps that [name]Eden[/name] seems a little different than the other 3 although it’s my favorite of the group. Another reason to sub [name]Eden[/name] with some other name is that [name]Eden[/name] may nn to [name]Edie[/name] (cute!) and [name]Addison[/name] may nn to [name]Addie[/name] (also cute) but they are so close to each other!
I favor more traditional names so I’d favor moving [name]Eva[/name], [name]Caroline[/name], and [name]Lucy[/name] to the front spot but that would still leave [name]Eden[/name] as a problem as it’s too close to [name]Eva[/name].
[name]Mackenzie[/name] [name]Caroline[/name] [name]Hope[/name] is a little bit of a mouthful.
I really love all the middle names and having virtue names for all 4 may be a little bit cutesy but it works especially since there are two middles for each. I would say that [name]Eden[/name]/[name]Edie[/name] and [name]Addison[/name]/[name]Addy[/name] are way too similar. [name]Edie[/name] and [name]Addy[/name], [name]Addy[/name] and [name]Edie[/name] - I can see these getting mixed up all the time.
I think switching them around to give your girls more classic firsts names is the way to go. For me, [name]Eden[/name], [name]Mackenzie[/name], [name]Addison[/name] and [name]Brooklyn[/name] are trendy and likely to date very soon - they’re on their way now, I would say. [name]Natalie[/name], [name]Caroline[/name], [name]Eva[/name] and [name]Lucy[/name] are all lovely names - classic but cute, and will not date.
I second (or third, fourth, etc.) these suggestions! [name]Eden[/name], [name]Mackenzie[/name], [name]Addison[/name], and [name]Brooklyn[/name] go well together, but I love [name]Natalie[/name], [name]Caroline[/name], [name]Lucy[/name], and [name]Eva[/name]!
I think switching them around to give your girls more classic firsts names is the way to go. For me, [name]Eden[/name], [name]Mackenzie[/name], [name]Addison[/name] and [name]Brooklyn[/name] are trendy and likely to date very soon - they’re on their way now, I would say. [name]Natalie[/name], [name]Caroline[/name], [name]Eva[/name] and [name]Lucy[/name] are all lovely names - classic but cute, and will not date.[/quote]
I completely agree-- I would [name]LOVE[/name] to see quadruplets named [name]Natalie[/name], [name]Caroline[/name], [name]Eva[/name], and [name]Lucy[/name]! Such a gorgeous sibset. I really don’t like [name]Mackenzie[/name], [name]Addison[/name], [name]Brooklyn[/name], and to a lesser extent [name]Eden[/name] because of the reasons already mentioned (tryndeigh, dated, won’t age well, etc.).
[name]How[/name] fun! I think you have some great names here, but I do have a couple suggestions. I love the ideas posted earlier about switching the names, but maybe you intentionally want unisex names?
My major concern is the nickname issue, especially [name]Addy[/name] and [name]Edie[/name] which seem overly similar. I think that could be very confusing. Also “Mie” ends with an “ee” like those too and then [name]Brooke[/name] is left out. Naming four sure isn’t easy!!
