I’m looking for your honest opinions on my favorite names and the combos I have them in. [name]Don[/name]'t be shy and have at it!
Comments, critiques, and suggestions are all welcome!
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] - really don’t like nola so just simply don’t like this.
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name] - sienna is lovely, dove is not my style at all! [name]Just[/name] sounds like trying to be “unique”
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name] - not keen on either of these names
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name] - sounds like it should be a flower name, sounds descriptive, but it is quite nice together despite that
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name] - too old, both names seem old fashioned to me and don’t balance each other out to make it modern and useable.
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name] - this is really nice, although I’d be tempted to make it [name]Arabella[/name] rose, but either way it’s lovely.
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name] - I don’t like bliss, too “nicey” and trying to sound beautiful
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name] - pearl is okay and so is juliette, not liking them together.
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom - not keen on bloom. As you can probably tell I’m not into over flowery or feminine names, but that’s just my opinion.
[name]Hope[/name] you find something that makes you happy no “bad” choices as such xxx
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name]- Very pretty, one of my favorites from your list.
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name]- Interesting with the mn [name]Dove[/name]. I don’t like [name]Sienna[/name] too much, but [name]Dove[/name] makes it sounds prettier
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name]- Pretty
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name]- I love [name]Belle[/name], and [name]Violet[/name] is a beautiful name and color.
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name]- Pretty, I love [name]Margot[/name].
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name]- I don’t like [name]Arabella[/name] as much, it just seems too trendy right now to use a bella name.
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name]- Interesting. The mn [name]Bliss[/name] balances out the long first name, and I actually like it.
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name]- Really like this
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom- [name]Luella[/name] is not my favorite, but with Bloom it is pretty.
I really like all your names, they are very classy and beautiful. My favorites from your list are [name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name], [name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name] and [name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name]. I love the middle names [name]Bliss[/name], Bloom, [name]Blossom[/name] and [name]Dove[/name].
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] - [name]Love[/name].
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name] - Not so keen on [name]Sienna[/name], don’t know if it’s true, but it feel trendy to me. [name]Dove[/name] is cute.
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name] - Like a lot, like it more and more thinking about it.
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name] - Everyone seems to love [name]Violet[/name], but I am just not feeling it. [name]Belle[/name] is one of your more boring choices.
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name] - [name]Love[/name] [name]Celia[/name], but [name]Margot[/name] feels dated to me.
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name] - [name]Love[/name] [name]Rose[/name], [name]Arabella[/name] is rather frilly, but still [name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name] is pretty.
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name] - Like it. Prefer [name]Blossom[/name] over [name]Bliss[/name].
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name] - Like it just fine.
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom - [name]Don[/name]'t like [name]Luella[/name], too much like Cruella for me. Bloom is lovely.
My three favorites are:
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name]
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name]
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name]
(and I like [name]Celia[/name], [name]Seraphina[/name], Bloom & [name]Dove[/name])
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name]: NMS.
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name]: I sort of like [name]Sienna[/name], but not [name]Dove[/name].
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name]: NMS
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name]: I like [name]Violet[/name], but not [name]Belle[/name].
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name]: I like it.
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name]: Not keen on either name.
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name]: Very pretty.
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name]: I like [name]Juliet[/name], but I’m not a huge fan of [name]Pearl[/name].
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom: Very cute.
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] - Dont like this sorry.
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name] - [name]Sienna[/name] is really nice but [name]Dove[/name] is Nms. What about [name]Sienna[/name] [name]Paloma[/name]? [name]Paloma[/name] is Spanish for dove.
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name] - Cute but I wouldn’t personally use it.
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name] - Really like this!
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name] - Not sure about this one. It’s just ok to me.
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name] - Nice but prefer [name]Arabella[/name] [name]Rose[/name].
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name] - Very cute really nice!
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name] - [name]Love[/name] both of these names it’s a nice combo!
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom - It’s cute but not sure if it’s kinda too cute.
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] – I find both names rather clunky, especially together.
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name] – I like this a lot. It is totally nmsaa, but it sounds so pretty together!
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name] – I want to like [name]Etta[/name] so much, since it’s a family name, but it just seems very fat to me for some reason. And so does [name]Blossom[/name], so I don’t like them together at all.
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name] – Gorgeous!
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name] – I really truly love [name]Celia[/name]. It’s just sweet. [name]Margot[/name] seems snotty and whiny.
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name] – I’m not a big fan of [name]Rose[/name] personally, but I think these two names together make a very sweet combo.
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name] – Really not my style. I think it sounds bloated and overdone.
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name] – Sweet! Not a big fan of [name]Juliette[/name], but I like these together.
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom – Another name that sounds fat to me.
In general, I like the style of your combinations more than the actual names themselves.
From favorite to least favorite:
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name] - sleek and stylish.
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name] - Very dainty and sweet.
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] - love this one, though I don’t really like Nola. The combo just works. Very zippy and yet sweet.
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom - I don’t like either of these names but the combo is just so fun to say. It’s very country bumpkin though.
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name] - again, I don’t like either name, but find the combo charming. I suppose [name]Etta[/name] could work as a full name, but I prefer it as a nickname.
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name] and [name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name] - both of these combos are too lacy, princess, ballerina pink kind of names, which is not my thing. I do love [name]Rose[/name] and [name]Violet[/name].
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name] -meh. I dont like either name. Together, it seems like you are trying too hard to be whimsical, sweet, and flowery.
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name] -same as above, only I find [name]Bliss[/name] to be pretty awful, rather than just mild dislike.
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] - I don’t like either names, [name]Nola[/name] sounds masculine to me prob because of all the [name]Nole[/name]'s and [name]Clementine[/name] just reminds me of oranges.
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name] - don’t like dove, makes me think of chocolate
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name] - [name]Etta[/name] Bloom would be cute, but I don’t like [name]Blossom[/name]
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name] - cute
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name] - sounds really old lady like
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name] - cute
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name] - not a fan of bliss, like dove I think of chocolate
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name] - lovely, more of a fan of the [name]Juliet[/name] spelling, I like things simple
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom - My favorite, but I too also would like to use Bloom as a middle so I’m biased!
I’m with nat108. I think [name]Etta[/name] Bloom would be better than [name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name]. All the rest I like though and I appreciate the fact that you put a the frillier names in the middle ([name]Dove[/name], Bloom, etc).
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] - Hate the name [name]Nola[/name]. [name]Clementine[/name] is okay, but I wouldn’t use it.
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name] - I like [name]Dove[/name] as a middle, and [name]Sienna[/name] is okay but not a favorite
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name] - [name]Etta[/name] is okay, agreed that [name]Etta[/name] Bloom would be better
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name] - this one is pretty
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name] - I like both names, but I think [name]Cecily[/name] [name]Margot[/name] would flow better
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name] - I’d prefer [name]Arabella[/name] [name]Rose[/name]
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name] - nice combo
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name] - I’d prefer [name]Juliet[/name] [name]Pearl[/name]
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom - I hate [name]Luella[/name], Bloom is a nice mn
Thank you guys!
I agree that [name]Etta[/name] Bloom sounds better than [name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name]. And I’m trying to find something that goes better with [name]Nola[/name] than [name]Clementine[/name], but it’s hard! If you guys have any suggestions for that, that would be awesome.
I also agree that [name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name] is a little too frilly; I was thinking maybe [name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Blythe[/name]?
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name]- I like [name]Nola[/name] but only for a nickname. [name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] is ok.
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name]- I like [name]Dove[/name], [name]Sienna[/name] isn’t my style at all. Sound nice together.
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name]- I really like [name]Etta[/name], so sweet, but [name]Blossom[/name] seems silly and juvenile
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name]- To me this sounds incomplete. I like both names, but it seems to need something more
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name]- I don’t like either names. [name]Love[/name] [name]Cecilia[/name] however.
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name]- Pretty.
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name]- [name]Seraphina[/name] is pretty. [name]Bliss[/name]- NMS at all.
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name]- I like [name]Pearl[/name], but I’m not sure it’s ready to come back yet. Still seems old ladyish to me. I also like [name]Juliette[/name] spelled [name]Juliet[/name]. [name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name] is actual a very nice name and I like it.
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom- I like [name]Luella[/name] (know a little girl named this), but Bloom is like [name]Blossom[/name] and [name]Bliss[/name].
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] - like [name]Nola[/name], not a fan of clementine and they don’t flow together
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name] - nice
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name] - etta is nice, dislike blossom
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name] - I always see violent from violet, so this combo is violent belle
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name] - my fav from your list. It sounds classic and pretty
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name] - dislike rose, find it very overused
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name]- [name]LOVE[/name] [name]LOVE[/name] [name]LOVE[/name]
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name] - feels overused, common
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom - Dislike both
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] - [name]Nola[/name] sounds very strange to me for some reason. As for [name]Clementine[/name]? Well, I think it’s really run its course.
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name] - I’d just as soon replace [name]Dove[/name] with [name]Paloma[/name], as stated by a previous poster.
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name] - [name]Etta[/name] is kind of sweet and brings to mind [name]Etta[/name] [name]James[/name]. [name]Blossom[/name] seems contrived and overtly frilly.
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name] - It’s alright, I suppose.
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name] - I kind of like [name]Margot[/name], but [name]Celia[/name] makes me think of celiac disease.
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name] - [name]WAY[/name] too frilly/prissy for me, just plain overkill. Maybe is [name]Rose[/name] was balanced out with something else.
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name] - Much like the above combo, but it’s just frilly overload. No name to balance it out, nothing.
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name] - I think [name]Juliette[/name] [name]Pearl[/name] flows a bit better, but that’s just me.
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom - [name]Luella[/name] seems clunky, and Bloom falls under the “trying hard to be beautiful” category.
[name]Nola[/name] [name]Clementine[/name]–I feel neutral about [name]Nola[/name], but I really like [name]Clementine[/name] in the middle name spot.
[name]Sienna[/name] [name]Dove[/name]–not a fan of either name
[name]Etta[/name] [name]Blossom[/name]–[name]Etta[/name] is pretty, but I don’t like [name]Blossom[/name].
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Belle[/name]–I really like [name]Violet[/name], but not [name]Belle[/name].
[name]Celia[/name] [name]Margot[/name]–I love both of these names but I’m not sure about pairing them. I generally prefer first names and middle names with different syllable counts. [name]How[/name] about [name]Margot[/name] [name]Clementine[/name]? Still, this is probably my favorite combination that you listed.
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Arabella[/name]–It’s pretty. I really like [name]Rose[/name] in the first name spot. I don’t really care for the name [name]Arabella[/name], but it works well with [name]Rose[/name] as a first name.
[name]Seraphina[/name] [name]Bliss[/name]–I don’t like it. I know a lot of nameberries like [name]Seraphina[/name], but to me all the angelic names sound a bit saccharine, and [name]Bliss[/name] just compounds that.
[name]Pearl[/name] [name]Juliette[/name]–very pretty, but I would slightly prefer [name]Juliette[/name] [name]Pearl[/name]. I guess it depends on the last name!
[name]Luella[/name] Bloom–Not a fan.
no “bad” choices as such xxx