[name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] vs [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]. Go!
I think [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] has a better flow overall. It’s very soft and feminine. [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] is just too many "t"s in one name.
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] or [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]. I like [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] more than [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] but [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] does not work well with [name_f]Hattie[/name_f]. First of all there are too many t’s in one name and [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] is often nicknamed [name_f]Lottie[/name_f]. It’s basically the same nickname.
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] most definitely! It’s a beautiful name. [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] is just too many t’s! I also see [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] as more of a nickname for [name_f]Harriet[/name_f] and when I see [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] I see [name_f]Lottie[/name_f] - [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Lottie[/name_f]!!
Like others have said, [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] has a few too many Ts in it. I also see the nickname “[name_f]Lottie[/name_f]” when I see [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] which is so similar to [name_f]Hattie[/name_f]. I think I [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] or:
[name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] [name_f]Hattie[/name_f]
[name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]
(I tend to like when there is some variation in syllables)
Definitely [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]. [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] is too nicknamey for my taste and bland [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] doesn’t balance it out enough. [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] flows really well and feels elegant and strong, yet unpretentious.
I can’t stand phoebe for some reason so I vote for [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]
I’ve gotta go with the minority and say I prefer [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]! I think it’s very cute, spunky, and familiar but not common! Have never loved the name [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] but [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] is a nice mn to pair with it.
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]!
I’m with the majority that think [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] has a lot of Ts and not the greatest flow. I love [name_f]Harriet[/name_f] though, and nickname [name_f]Hattie[/name_f].
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Louise[/name_f] ([name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_u]Lou[/name_u]?)
[name_f]Harriet[/name_f] [name_f]Maude[/name_f]
I much prefer [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] to [name_f]Phoebe[/name_f]. Perhaps [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f], [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f], [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f]?
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] is gorgeous. [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] is too cutesy and I don’t like [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] with it.
[name_f]Phoebe[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] is gorgeous. But I agree with a pp that [name_f]Hattie[/name_f] [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f] would be cute too.