I like all the names and think they all go well with [name_m]Graham[/name_m] & [name_m]Henry[/name_m]. I voted for [name_u]Everett[/name_u], but I like them all.
I decided I would rank them from my most favorite to my least favorite ( even though my least favorite is still usable)
I am torn. I am a big fan of honour names. I love [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] as a combination. [name_m]Charles[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] is also a strong pair with the added bonus of honouring both families. As individual first names with your boys I prefer the sibset of [name_m]Graham[/name_m], [name_m]Henry[/name_m] and [name_m]Charles[/name_m].
While I like some of the other names and combos better, I voted for [name_m]Charles[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] because of the family significance. I don’t think you’ll regret honoring people who are special to you.
[name_u]James[/name_u] [name_m]Charles[/name_m], I like this one a lot. [name_u]Jameson[/name_u] [name_m]Charles[/name_m], Charlten Jamos, Charlsten Jamous
[name_m]Graham[/name_m], [name_m]Henry[/name_m], and [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] sound like the perfect set of brothers to me. I love those names so much:) [name_u]Everett[/name_u] and [name_m]Charles[/name_m] make my second and third choices, respectively.
In order of favorites from top (most liked) to bottom:
[name_m]Charles[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]: both names represented; it’s not my favorite combination, but to me significance trumps all. With no more kids in the future, I think it’s better to just use both.
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]
[name_m]Charles[/name_m] [name_u]Everett[/name_u]
[name_m]Patrick[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]: I don’t think [name_m]Patrick[/name_m]'s ending flows well into the beginning of your surname. I do like [name_m]Patrick[/name_m] though.
I can picture [name_m]Graham[/name_m], [name_m]Henry[/name_m] and little [name_u]Teddy[/name_u] as brothers. And [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] is a strong, classic name