Of your picks, per name, I like (in order of most to least):
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] [name_f]Claire[/name_f]
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f]
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f]
1 Like
One important question is whether you want to reserve your alternate names for a future second child. If NOT, then why not use them all? [name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_f]Eva[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is wonderful! But if SO, then you need to stay away from them completely. I think my favorites from your list are:
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_f]Clementine[/name_f]
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] [name_f]Clementine[/name_f] or [name_f]Eva[/name_f] [name_m]Valentine[/name_m]
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f]
[name_f]Clementine[/name_f], [name_m]Valentine[/name_m], and [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] are all both classic and unexpected. They’re also all three syllables, a good balance to your one or two syllable first names. Generally, it works better for the first and middle names to be a different number of syllables.
Consider the rhythm with your surname too. Combinations like (this is in number of syllables) 3-2-1 or 2-1-3 work generally work best but of course that’s far from the only consideration.
[name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_f]Iris[/name_f], [name_f]Estelle[/name_f] [name_f]Dove[/name_f]
[name_f]Eva[/name_f] [name_f]Clementine[/name_f], [name_f]Eva[/name_f] [name_f]Juliette[/name_f]
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Juliette[/name_f], [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f]