…not that there’s anything WRONG with that.
But I lean towards the extreme with baby names. 4 of my other five kids have very unusual names, the most normal among them being [name]Bronwen[/name] for my oldest daughter. (nickname: [name]Buffy[/name]). I worry that a really normal name will stand out, and I’m also really selfish and was hoping this would be my chance to have a [name]Seraphina[/name] or a [name]Dove[/name]-[name]Isabeau[/name].
So, yes, I’m the one carrying this baby; yes, I’m the baby name addict and my husband barely tolerates baby names; but if this next baby is a girl, it will be Daughter #4 and he has always, always, always loved the name [name]Rachel[/name].
Help?
He objects to [name]Raquel[/name], [name]Rakel[/name], or [name]Rachelle[/name].
No [name]Ray[/name]/[name]Rae[/name] because my dad is a [name]Ray[/name] and lives nearby, and we agreed a long time ago that while it’s sweet to name a kid after a living relative, it’s weird to say “I’m going to change [name]Ray[/name]'s diaper” as though said older relative were having some incontinence issues.
He [name]MAY[/name] allow Relle/[name]Rella[/name]/Relly as a nickname.
Suggestions? Comments? What y’all think of the [name]Rella[/name] solution?