I have a girl
[name_f]Felicity[/name_f]
And then boys
[name_m]Desmond[/name_m]
[name_u]Roscoe[/name_u]
And [name_m]Leif[/name_m]
And now pregnant with identical twin boys
It took a LONG time to find more boy names that my husband and I could agree on. We have narrowed down baby B to [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] I think but can’t decide between [name_m]Frank[/name_m] (Frankie) or [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] for baby A.
I know in general my kids names don’t totally match or go together but I’m struggling with not knowing if any of the 3 twin name ideas go together.
So either
[name_m]Enoch[/name_m] [name_u]Daniel[/name_u] & [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Cole[/name_m]
[name_u]Or[/name_u]
[name_m]Frank[/name_m] [name_u]Daniel[/name_u] and [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_m]Cole[/name_m]
The middles are to honor family members like we have done for our other boys
So: [name_f]Felicity[/name_f], [name_m]Desmond[/name_m], [name_u]Roscoe[/name_u],
[name_m]Leif[/name_m], [name_m]Frank[/name_m] & [name_m]Hugo[/name_m]
To be honest I think they both work, but if I had to pick one I’d go for [name_m]Frank[/name_m] being a slightly better match! I think matching with older siblings isn’t a huge deal (as long as the names aren’t shockingly different, like a [name_f]Jane[/name_f] and an Amaranthine lol), but having a name that sounds reasonable with a twin sibling matters a little more, and I think [name_m]Frank[/name_m] and [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] are my favourite pair of the two!
[name_m]Enoch[/name_m]! Then each kiddo has their own initial (a plus), and I think [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] is so unique and interesting—a flair all of your babes’ names totally have. [name_m]Frank[/name_m] feels only a little lacklustre with those sibling names.
both are amazing and great matches of course, but i love an enoch representation, and i think it pulls and fits to the adventurous side of the boys’ names, while still being a classic, though less common, to match hugo, and hugo matches felicity. enoch and hugo sounds posh~~
So I absolutely love [name_m]Enoch[/name_m]. For me [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] is just fab he’s interesting, distinctive, has cool biblical connotations, has a quirky sound and feels very unexpected. I like [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] in your sibling set as each child has their own initial and I think he marries up well with [name_m]Hugo[/name_m].
I like that both [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] and [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] has an O in them. [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] is less common than [name_m]Frank[/name_m] and both [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] and [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] have cool vibes to me.
I prefer [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] with your other kids names, but [name_m]Frank[/name_m] also goes well. I like the flow of [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] [name_u]Daniel[/name_u] a bit better than [name_m]Frank[/name_m] [name_u]Daniel[/name_u], which both have the “an” sound.
[name_f]Felicity[/name_f], [name_m]Desmond[/name_m], [name_u]Roscoe[/name_u], [name_m]Leif[/name_m], [name_m]Hugo[/name_m], and [name_m]Frank[/name_m]! [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] feels very solemn and Biblical to me whereas [name_m]Frank[/name_m] is more in line with the quirky vintage feel of your other kids’ names.
Then each kiddo has their own initial (a plus), and I think [name_m]Enoch[/name_m] is so unique and interesting—a flair all of your babes’ names totally have. [name_m]Frank[/name_m] feels only a little lacklustre with those sibling names.