Which of these names do you think are the best to use and why? What do you think of each one?
[name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] -
[name_f]Bridget[/name_f] -
[name_u]Billie[/name_u] -
[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] “[name_f]Milly[/name_f]” -
[name_f]Frida[/name_f] -
[name_f]Greta[/name_f] -
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] -
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] -
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] “[name_u]Billie[/name_u]” -
[name_f]Pearl[/name_f] -
[name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] “[name_f]Rose[/name_f]” -
[name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] - [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] is quite nice. There’s something royal and elegant about it. I prefer [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] a little though
[name_f]Bridget[/name_f] - strong and powerful feeling
[name_u]Billie[/name_u] - cute, quirky and bubbly
[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] “[name_f]Milly[/name_f]” - [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] is soft but elegant and [name_f]Milly[/name_f] is sweet. It is popular though
[name_f]Frida[/name_f] - [name_f]Frida[/name_f] is tough but cute!
[name_f]Greta[/name_f] - I don’t mind it. It has a distinctive, warm kind of feeling
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] - [name_f]Jane[/name_f] is vintage, literary, versatile and sweet
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] - strong and feminine. It’s okay
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] “[name_u]Billie[/name_u]” - I love this!! [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] is so warm, cosy and lovely and [name_u]Billie[/name_u] adds something quirky and bubbly
[name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] is delightful! I love the sounds and imagery
[name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] “[name_f]Rose[/name_f]” - [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] has a kind of delicacy while also sounded sophisticated and strong
[name_f]Pearl[/name_f], [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] and [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] are my favourites
[name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] - very vintage and the nickname [name_f]Bea[/name_f] is adorable
[name_f]Bridget[/name_f] - sounds outdated to me
[name_u]Billie[/name_u] - very outdated in my opinion and doesn’t feel like a stand alone name to me
[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] - a little too popular for me, but pretty nonetheless
[name_f]Frida[/name_f] - [name_u]LOVE[/name_u]!
[name_f]Greta[/name_f] - not my favorite
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] - I can’t get past “plain [name_f]Jane[/name_f]”
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] - pretty
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] - super cute! I don’t think [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] needs a nickname
[name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - cute!
[name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] - definitely my favorite from your list! Beautiful and vintage, but still fresh
The two names I love out of all your options are [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] and [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] though I prefer the nickname [name_f]Emmie[/name_f] or [name_f]Emmy[/name_f] over [name_f]Milly[/name_f]. I also like [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f], [name_f]Greta[/name_f], [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] and [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f]. The others are ok. [name_u]Billie[/name_u] is the only name I wouldn’t use myself as though is just personal taste I think suits a boy over a girl more.
Hey! Out of all your names I think my favourite is [name_f]Mabel[/name_f]! It’s such a cute yet quirky name and I love the nickname [name_u]Billie[/name_u] with it. I also love [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] and [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f]!
[name_m]Hi[/name_m] there.
Here are my thoughts:
[name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] - So cute. It has a kind homely feel, but also sounds wise.
[name_f]Bridget[/name_f] - I love this. Kind of a similar feel as [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f]. [name_m]Just[/name_m] sounds like a very nice smart girl. It’s simple & well known, but not over done. I love the nn [name_f]Bridie[/name_f].
[name_u]Billie[/name_u] - I wouldn’t do it as a full name.
[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] “[name_f]Milly[/name_f]” - Very nice. Ultra feminine, yet sophisticated. [name_f]Milly[/name_f] is just adorable.
[name_f]Frida[/name_f] - I feel like I should like this, but it’s just a little harsh sounding.
[name_f]Greta[/name_f] - [name_m]Even[/name_m] though this is similar to [name_f]Frida[/name_f], I just love it. It’s sooo sweet & has old fashioned charm. It’s also a little bit spunky.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] -This is fine. Not super exciting (obviously), but perfectly nice.
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] - I like this a lot. It’s another one of those feminine names, but it’s also smart & not frilly.
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] “[name_u]Billie[/name_u]” -[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] is adorable. Old fashioned & a little quirky. [name_u]Billie[/name_u] is not my personal favorite for a girl, but this is unique & kind of fun.
[name_f]Pearl[/name_f] -[name_u]Love[/name_u] it! So beautiful & elegant.
[name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] “[name_f]Rose[/name_f]” -[name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] is nice. A little dramatic, but also kind sounding. I like [name_f]Rose[/name_f], but feel like it’s more of a full name. I’d do just [name_f]Rose[/name_f], or maybe [name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] nn [name_f]Rosie[/name_f].
My personal favorite is [name_f]Greta[/name_f], but a great list!
[name_f]Hope[/name_f] this helps. 
[name_f]Beatrice[/name_f], [name_f]Bridget[/name_f], [name_f]Frida[/name_f], and [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] seem like the best first name options to me. They all have a classic charm and are both pretty and strong. They’re all familiar but not overly popular or trendy. They have history but aren’t outdated.
[name_f]Frida[/name_f] is the most refreshing to me, but I definitely see the appeal of [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] “[name_u]Billie[/name_u]”.
I like [name_f]Greta[/name_f] as well I just don’t feel as strongly about it as the 4 previously mentioned.
All of your names are lovely names, though I think most of the others would do well enough as middles.
My personal favourites are [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] and [name_f]Louisa[/name_f]. [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] is a good alternative for a popular [name_f]Emily[/name_f] and Loisa is a classic that never get dated.
I love [name_f]Bridget[/name_f] and [name_f]Greta[/name_f], both feisty, feminine, unexpected but quite traditional in feel.
[name_f]Jane[/name_f], [name_f]Emilia[/name_f], [name_f]Louisa[/name_f], good names. [name_u]Billie[/name_u] is cute. Not such a fan of the others. I prefer [name_f]Rose[/name_f] on its own.
My favourites are [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f], [name_u]Billie[/name_u], [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] “[name_f]Milly[/name_f]”, [name_f]Louisa[/name_f], and [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] (though not keen on [name_u]Billie[/name_u] as the nn, personally).
[name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] - This feels outdated and unattractive to me, however I am fond of [name_f]Beatrix[/name_f] as an alternative which feels more vintage rather than outdated.
[name_f]Bridget[/name_f] - I really like [name_f]Bridget[/name_f]! I think she’s sweet, and underused.
[name_u]Billie[/name_u] - I’ve never really liked [name_u]Billie[/name_u] on a girl. There is something endearing about her, but it’s definitely not for me.
[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] “[name_f]Milly[/name_f]” - [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] is beautiful! [name_f]Milly[/name_f], not so much. [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] is so pretty by itself, why hide it behind [name_f]Milly[/name_f]?
[name_f]Frida[/name_f] - I don’t know how to explain what I think about [name_f]Frida[/name_f]. It’s not my style I’m afraid.
[name_f]Greta[/name_f] - This is okay, a little underwhelming
[name_f]Jane[/name_f] - Very plain for a first name, but cute in the middle spot.
[name_f]Louisa[/name_f] - I actually like [name_f]Louisa[/name_f] more than I think. She’s sweet!
[name_f]Mabel[/name_f] “[name_u]Billie[/name_u]” - [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] is a little old fashioned, but I can see the appeal. I wouldn’t use [name_u]Billie[/name_u] as a nn though.
[name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - I’m not a fan, unfortunately!
[name_f]Rosalind[/name_f] “[name_f]Rose[/name_f]” - This is nice. Any [name_f]Rose[/name_f]- name is pretty. And [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is a lovely simple nickname
My favourite is [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] (without a nn), followed by [name_f]Bridget[/name_f] and [name_f]Louisa[/name_f].