I know that its highly unlikely but I really would like to have triplets - all girls. Hypothetically I would love to use…
[name]Elizabeth[/name] ‘[name]Libby[/name]’
[name]Louisa[/name] ‘[name]Lou[/name]’
[name]Delilah[/name] ‘[name]Lilah[/name]’
[name]Do[/name] you think that even though the first names are all very different, that the nn’s are cute or are they way too matchy? And what would you suggest as middle names for each of them?
Thanks Berries!
adorable choices!
I think they’re sweet together in full. I love [name]Louisa[/name], like [name]Delilah[/name] and [name]Elizabeth[/name] is solid (just not my cup of tea). I’m not much of a nickname fan, so [name]Lou[/name], [name]Libby[/name] and [name]Lilah[/name] don’t really strike my fancy… and with 3 L names, they are pretty matchy, but they are very nice names in general.
For middle names, I love these:
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Ivy[/name]
[name]Louisa[/name] [name]Bryony[/name]
[name]Delilah[/name] [name]June[/name]
If I were allowed to tweak, I would be head-over-heels for [name]Louisa[/name], [name]Jemima[/name] and [name]Elspeth[/name].
I think you have some very nice favourites here 
and I just wanted to say thank you for posting about a hypothetical set. Hopefully the people who are trying to lead the board on with pretend stories will follow suit and realize that thinking about hypothetical children, singletons or multiples, is completely okay, and that they don’t need to make up stories to talk about multiples.