Girls:
[name]Cassia[/name]/[name]Calla[/name]: [name]Cassia[/name], [name]Cassia[/name] [name]Cassia[/name]!!! I like both names, but there’s a classic quality to [name]Cassia[/name] that [name]Calla[/name] somewhat lacks. I also think that both pronunciations are fantastic.
[name]Elowen[/name]: Very melodic and also a new addition to my list.
[name]Willow[/name]: [name]Love[/name]! I love the image of the willow tree gently swaying in the wind.
[name]Sparrow[/name]: Naw, this one isn’t for me. As far as bird names go, the only one I really like is Kestrel, and the alrights are [name]Lark[/name] and [name]Wren[/name].
[name]Josie[/name]: I see the appeal, and while it is cute, it just reminds me of the full version [name]Josephine[/name], a name I’m personally not that fond of.
[name]Fawn[/name]/[name]Dawn[/name]: [name]Fawn[/name]…maybe, just maybe for the middle spot, but I don’t think it’ll work for a first name. [name]Dawn[/name], eh, it’s alright, but I’d rather see [name]Aurora[/name] or other day/evening-related names.
Boys:
[name]Oak[/name] - Pokemon! haha, sorry, but that really was my first thought. To me, it’s a little too unsubstantial as a full first name. Middle name…hmmm…I think it would really depend on that first name. [name]Ronan[/name] [name]Oak[/name], cute. [name]Gunnar[/name] [name]Oak[/name], nah. [name]Oakley[/name] is cute and might be better first name material, but possibly a little (too) feminine?
[name]Forest[/name] - Better than [name]Oak[/name], but heh, I can’t put my finger on what it is that keeps me from liking this name. It has all the qualities I look for in a boy name-classic, underused, a rough masculine feel to it- but I don’t know, it just doesn’t click for me.
Not too sure about [name]Forest[/name], but I really like [name]Oak[/name]. (for a middle name.)
Hmm, names I’m currently crushing on…
[name]Fiammetta[/name]
[name]Rialta[/name]
[name]Cassia[/name] (as always
)
[name]Indiana[/name] ‘[name]Indy[/name]’
[name]Rose[/name]