[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Claire[/name] – Very simple and sweet.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Johanna[/name] – Very biblical, which I like, but I don’t love the flow of this one.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Adelaide[/name] – [name]Even[/name] though both names are long, this has a very melodic sound!
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Eden[/name] – I like this.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Jane[/name] – This one sounds a little too plain.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Katherine[/name] – Very regal and classic.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Laurel[/name] – I’m partial to [name]Laurel[/name] as it’s my name, but I don’t think it flows well here. [name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Daphne[/name]?
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Cecilia[/name] – Too long.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Claire[/name]- Kind of filler-y
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Johanna[/name]- [name]Love[/name] both names, but they don’t flow well
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Adelaide[/name]- Actually flows well, surprisingly.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Eden[/name]- Pretty and whimsical
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Jane[/name]- Classic, but kind of generic and filler-y
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Katherine[/name]- Too long for me, but classic.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Laurel[/name]- Doesn’t really flow.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Cecilia[/name]- Too long.
I love [name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Claire[/name] from your list. [name]Claire[/name] [name]Elisabeth[/name] [name]Louisa[/name] will be the name we use if this baby is a girl! I also love [name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Jane[/name] and [name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Cecilia[/name]. (It is kind of long but I really like it) Here are some suggestions.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Joy[/name]
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Kate[/name] ( I really like this one too)
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Marie[/name]
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Sofia[/name]
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Sophie[/name]
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Louisa[/name]
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Danielle[/name]
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Maeve[/name]
[name]Elizabeth[/name] Lynae
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Vivian[/name]
Elizabeth Claire - unless it’s a family name I think this is a bit plain
Elizabeth Johanna - don’t love the flow (but go for it if it’s a family name - can you tell I like family mns?)
Elizabeth Adelaide - long but I still love this one - beautiful
Elizabeth Eden - a little more modern and punchy - like this too
Elizabeth Jane - same comment as for Claire
Elizabeth Katherine - classic but not very original - prefer Adelaide by far
Elizabeth Laurel - don’t love this combo, not sure why
Elizabeth Cecilia - my least favourite. The sounds don’t mesh for me, and Cecilia seems too syllabic
Elizabeth Marlowe
Elizabeth Leigh
Elizabeth Pearl
Elizabeth Wren
Elizabeth Elodie
I love [name]Elizabeth[/name], but without a middle name that is either zippy and colorful, or elegant and regal, it loses some of its beauty [name]IMO[/name].
[name]Claire[/name], [name]Johanna[/name], [name]Adelaide[/name], and [name]Eden[/name] don’t do it justice. [name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Eden[/name] really sounds like [name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Arden[/name] to me.
[name]Jane[/name] is a wonderful name. It sets off [name]Elizabeth[/name] and matches its simple queenliness.
[name]Katherine[/name] is also very regal, but I find it almost too matchy with [name]Elizabeth[/name], and too expected.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Laurel[/name]- Unlike others, I really like this. [name]Laurel[/name] is a beautiful botanical name with associations of victory and honor, and I think its smooth sounds contrast nicely with [name]Elizabeth[/name]'s frosty sparkling clarity.
[name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Cecilia[/name]- [name]Cecilia[/name] is a pretty name, but the flow of it with [name]Elizabeth[/name] feels off to me. [name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Celestine[/name]? [name]Elizabeth[/name] [name]Camille[/name]? Hmm… I like [name]Jane[/name] and [name]Laurel[/name] more.
