Oh man, I’m addicted. And things are getting totally hypothetical because I’ve been dreaming up name combinations for babies that aren’t even a possibility right now.
Firstly, I’m having an [name]Emily[/name] [name]Eliza[/name] [name]May[/name] (small possibility of [name]Emily[/name] [name]Louisa[/name] [name]May[/name]) a bit later this year - at least, I think that’s the name (popularity doesn’t worry me, I’ve just gone for a special name that I love and has some family connection). I was wondering if you had any feedback on this name?
And now, to feed my name obsession, I’d love some feedback on [name]Em[/name]'s potential future sisters…
[name]Matilda[/name] [name]Rose[/name] [name]Catherine[/name]
(I’m in love, but are [name]Emily[/name] and [name]Matilda[/name] too mismatched as a sibset?)
[name]Louisa[/name] [name]Kitty[/name] [name]Rose[/name]
[name]Louisa[/name] [name]Tillie[/name] [name]Catherine[/name]
(Which do you prefer? Also, as much as I adore the nicknames “[name]Lu[/name]” and “[name]Lulu[/name]”, I really could not use them for confusion reasons with my own name. Grrrrr. Could a [name]Louisa[/name] avoid these nicknames and get “[name]Lola[/name]” as an occasional nickname instead, or is that pushing it?)
[name]Isobel[/name] [name]Ruby[/name] [name]Catherine[/name]
[name]Susanna[/name] Something Something (maybe [name]Susanna[/name] [name]Clara[/name] [name]Jane[/name] or [name]Susanna[/name] [name]Lila[/name] [name]Rose[/name])
Apologies if you’re cringing at the “[name]Rose[/name]” overload. [name]Rose[/name] is special to me.
Thanks so much, hopefully this can become a reality someday!