WDYT of this combination?
I think [name_f]Olive[/name_f] does wonders for [name_f]Imogen[/name_f], which I’m not personally fond of. I’m not convinced by [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] though, but the sound of the combo is nice. I would probably choose [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Sabina[/name_f] or [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Zephyra[/name_f] personally, they have the same sound but work better for me.
I also like [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] Lazuli or [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Garnet[/name_f] or [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Amethyst[/name_f]. [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Esmeralda[/name_f]?
Something about [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] makes me struggle to take her seriously, possibly because of the dragon in “Eragon” which I read as a teen but have moved quite past, and would not consider reading again, or think to recommend to my children when they reach the right age.
[name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] flows beautifully but [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] looks a little out of place to me
I agree with this.
I agree that [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] is stunning, but [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] throws it off.
I’d say [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] and ditch [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] as some other previous posters have also said
[name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] does have a different vibe to [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] and [name_f]Olive[/name_f] (to me). I feel like [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] is elegant, exotic, a bit mysterious, whereas [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] and [name_f]Olive[/name_f] are energetic, more playful and boisterous. But I think in terms of flow [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] would be really lovely.
I agree as well. [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] is fine on its own but I like the PP above’s suggestion of [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Garnet[/name_f].
I love the three names separately, and I love [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f], [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] and [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f], but the three names together seem like too much of a mouthful for my tastes. [name_m]Even[/name_m] [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] flows slightly better.
Agree with the others, I love [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f]!
I agree with the others - I’d leave it at [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f], which is a wonderful name!
[name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] is lovely, but adding [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] makes it feel like you’re trying too hard.
I like all the names separately, but not in this order or together. What about…
Imogen Olivia Sapphire or
Imogen Sapphira Olive
Thanks for all of your feedback! I can definitely see where you are all coming from. I might think of a different second middle for [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f], or use [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f].
I agree with everyone else who said that [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] is lovely, but I’m not a fan of [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] as a name. I like the cadence of the combo though- what about [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Sofia[/name_f], [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Sabrina[/name_f] or [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] [name_f]Serena[/name_f]? They would all be lovely and have the same feminine, a bit dreamy but also practical feel.
I like [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f]. I’d remove the [name_f]Olive[/name_f].
[name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] is gorgeous. If you must have [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] then [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Sapphira[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] flows better.